Implications of dispositional and process views of traits for individual difference research in leadership

被引:66
作者
Dinh, Jessica E. [1 ]
Lord, Robert G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Psychol, Akron, OH 44325 USA
关键词
Leadership perception; Leadership behavior; Process approaches; Dispositional approaches; Intrapersonal dynamics; PERFORMANCE-APPRAISAL; SHARED LEADERSHIP; GOAL PROGRESS; SELF-CONCEPT; PERSONALITY; MODEL; EMERGENCE; BEHAVIOR; TASK; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.003
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This article assesses the conceptual and methodological limitations associated with traditional dispositional approaches to personality and leadership, and it proposes that more process-oriented approaches will better enable leadership research to explore emergent leadership phenomena such as perception and effectiveness. By reconceptualizing the structure of the self as a dynamic, but stable entity, we maintain that an explicit focus on events as a fundamental level of analysis is needed, which will help reduce the inaccuracies of aggregate retrospective leadership measures that collapse across different situations and time. Event-level research methodologies can also help account for the effects that situational contingencies have on leader behavioral flexibility, the development of leadership skills, and leadership emergence within shared or distributive leadership structures. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 669
页数:19
相关论文
共 185 条
[31]  
Dalal R.S., 2008, Work motivation, past, present, and future, P64, DOI DOI 10.1177/0149206314532691
[32]  
Day D., 2009, An integrative theory of leadership development: Connecting adult development, identity, and expertise
[33]  
Day D. V., OXFORD HDB IN PRESS
[34]  
Day D.V., 2012, The nature of leadership, V2nd, P108
[35]   Longitudinal tests of an integrative model of leader development: Charting and understanding developmental trajectories [J].
Day, David V. ;
Sin, Hock-Peng .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2011, 22 (03) :545-560
[36]   Leadership development: A review in context [J].
Day, DV .
LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2000, 11 (04) :581-613
[37]   Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework [J].
Dehaene, S ;
Naccache, L .
COGNITION, 2001, 79 (1-2) :1-37
[38]  
DeRue D.S., 2010, ACAD MANAGE REV, V35, P627
[39]   TRAIT AND BEHAVIORAL THEORIES OF LEADERSHIP: AN INTEGRATION AND META-ANALYTIC TEST OF THEIR RELATIVE VALIDITY [J].
DeRue, D. Scott ;
Nahrgang, Jennifer D. ;
Wellman, Ned ;
Humphrey, Stephen E. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (01) :7-52
[40]   Developing Leaders via Experience: The Role of Developmental Challenge, Learning Orientation, and Feedback Availability [J].
DeRue, D. Scott ;
Wellman, Ned .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (04) :859-875