THE UTILITY OF SAPROF-YV RATINGS FOR PREDICTING RECIDIVISM IN MALE YOUTH UNDER COMMUNITY SUPERVISION IN SINGAPORE

被引：10

作者：

Chu, Chi Meng ^{[1
,2
]}

Xu, Xuexin ^{[1
]}

Li, Dongdong ^{[1
]}

Ruby, Kala ^{[2
]}

Chng, Grace S. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Natl Council Social Serv, Singapore, Singapore

[2] Minist Social & Family Dev, Singapore, Singapore

来源：

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR | 2020年 / 47卷 / 11期

关键词：

SAPROF; YLS/CMI; 2.0; protective factors; recidivism; risk assessment; ASSESSING PROTECTIVE FACTORS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; JUVENILE JUSTICE; VIOLENCE RISK; OFFENDERS; VALIDITY; YLS/CMI; DESISTANCE; GENDER; SAVRY;

D O I：

10.1177/0093854820949595

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

There is bourgeoning empirical support for the usage of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors (SAPROF) across many jurisdictions, but there is a dearth of research on the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk-Youth Version (SAPROF-YV). This study examined (a) the predictive validity of the SAPROF-YV ratings for general recidivism and (b) the incremental predictive validity of the SAPROF-YV ratings when used in conjunction with the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI) 2.0 ratings. Using a sample of 822 male youths who were involved with the justice system and under community supervision in Singapore, the results showed that the SAPROF-YV total score and final protection judgment rating were significantly predictive of general recidivism. Moreover, the SAPROF-YV total score and final judgment rating showed incremental predictive validity over the YLS/CMI 2.0 total score and risk rating. Overall, the results suggest that SAPROF-YV ratings are suited for assessing justice-involved youth within the Singaporean context and can be used in conjunction with YLS/CMI 2.0 ratings for predicting recidivism.

引用

页码：1409 / 1427

页数：19

共 63 条

[1] Predicting physically violent misconduct in prison: A comparison of four risk assessment instruments [J].

Abbiati, Milena ;

Palix, Julie ;

Gasser, Jacques ;

Moulin, Valerie .

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2019, 37 (01) :61-77

[2] Validity and Predictive Accuracy of the Structured Assessment of Protective Factors for Violence Risk in Criminal Forensic Evaluations: A Swiss Cross-Validation Retrospective Study [J].

Abbiati, Milena ;

Azzola, Agathe ;

Palix, Julie ;

Gasser, Jacques ;

Moulin, Valerie .

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2017, 44 (04) :493-510

[3] Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: prospective study of structured professional judgement instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services [J].

Abidin, Zareena ;

Davoren, Mary ;

Naughton, Leena ;

Gibbons, Olivia ;

Nulty, Andrea ;

Kennedy, Harry G. .

BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 13

[4]

[Anonymous], 2012, SAPROF GUIDELINES AS

[5]

[Anonymous], 2009, SAPROF GUIDELINES AS

[6]

Bhanwer A. K., 2016, THESIS

[7]

Bonta J., 2017, PSYCHOL CRIMINAL CON, V6th

[8]

Borum R., 2006, Manual for the structured assessment of violence risk in youth (SAVRY)

[9]

Bujang MA, 2017, ARCH OROFAC SCI, V12, P1

[10] The Predictive Validity of Savry Ratings for Assessing Youth Offenders in Singapore: A Comparison With YLS/CMI Ratings [J].

Chu, Chi Meng ;

Goh, Mui Leng ;

Chong, Dominic .

CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR, 2016, 43 (06) :793-810

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →