Neonatal hearing screening in remote areas of China: a comparison between rural and urban populations

被引:16
作者
Wu Wenjin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang Xiangrong [4 ]
Li Yun [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Lue Jingrong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen Jianyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang Xueling [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang Zhiwu [1 ,3 ,5 ]
Wu Hao [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ear Inst, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Xinhua Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Sci & Technol Comm, Shanghai Key Lab Translat Med Ear & Nose Dis, Shanghai, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Guangxi Prov Liuzhou City Maternal & Child Hlth H, Liuzhou, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[5] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Hosp 9, 639 Zhizaoju Rd, Shanghai 200011, Peoples R China
关键词
Neonatal hearing screening; distortion product otoacoustic emission; automated auditory brainstem response; developing country; FOLLOW-UP; IMPAIRMENT; PROGRAM; LANGUAGE; CHILDREN; INFANTS; DEFAULT; NICU; AGE;
D O I
10.1177/0300060517706643
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives Universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) started late in some underdeveloped areas in China, with relatively scarce screening resources and a wide regional distribution. This study aimed to compare the screening performance between rural and urban populations, and to examine the characteristics and problems of UNHS in underdeveloped regions in China. Methods A two-step hearing screening program was used in neonates born in Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital and in patients who were born in other hospitals, but admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. This program involved distortion product otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response. Characteristics of each newborn, as well as the screening outcomes and performance were compared between rural and urban populations. Results A total of 19,098 newborns were screened with a referral rate of 17.9% at the first step. Sixty-three (0.33%) newborns had hearing loss. The prevalence of permanent hearing loss was 2.25. The average screening age was significantly older in the rural population than in the urban population in the first (P<0.01) and second steps of screening (P<0.05). The rural population had a higher referral rate in both steps than the urban population (P<0.01). The follow-up rate was much lower in the rural population than in the urban population (P<0.05), but dramatically increased in 2014 compared with the previous 2 years. Conclusions A low follow-up rate is a critical issue when carrying out UNHS in developing countries, such as China, especially for rural populations. The government should establish more hearing referral centres to increase service coverage and supply financial assistance for low-income populations.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 651
页数:15
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Sante, 1999, EV CLIN EC DEP NEON
[2]   NICU-only versus universal screening for newborn hearing loss: Population audit [J].
Barker, Melinda J. ;
Hughes, Elizabeth K. ;
Wake, Melissa .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2013, 49 (01) :E74-E79
[3]   Outcome of a universal newborn hearing-screening programme based on multiple transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and clinical brainstem response audiometry [J].
Berninger, Erik ;
Westling, Birgitta .
ACTA OTO-LARYNGOLOGICA, 2011, 131 (07) :728-739
[4]   Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs [J].
Busa, Jackie ;
Harrison, Judy ;
Chappell, Jodie ;
Yoshinaga-Itano, Christine ;
Grimes, Alison ;
Brookhouser, Patrick E. ;
Epstein, Stephen ;
Mehl, Albert ;
Vohr, Betty ;
Gravel, Judith ;
Roush, Jack ;
Widen, Judith ;
Benedict, Beth S. ;
Scoggins, Bobbie ;
King, Michelle ;
Pippins, Linda ;
Savage, David H. .
PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (04) :898-921
[5]   Delays in Diagnosis of Congenital Hearing Loss in Rural Children [J].
Bush, Matthew L. ;
Bianchi, Kristin ;
Lester, Cathy ;
Shinn, Jennifer B. ;
Gal, Thomas J. ;
Fardo, David W. ;
Schoenberg, Nancy .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2014, 164 (02) :393-397
[6]  
Davis A., 1997, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V1, P1
[7]   Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study [J].
Fortnum, HM ;
Summerfield, AQ ;
Marshall, DH ;
Davis, AC ;
Bamford, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7312) :536-539
[8]  
Gabbard Sandra Abbott, 1999, Seminars in Hearing, V20, P291, DOI 10.1055/s-0028-1082945
[9]   Evaluation of an automated auditory brainstem response in a multi-stage infant hearing screening [J].
Guastini, Luca ;
Mora, Renzo ;
Dellepiane, Massimo ;
Santomauro, Valentina ;
Mora, Massimiliano ;
Rocca, Antonio ;
Salami, Angelo .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2010, 267 (08) :1199-1205
[10]   Cost-effectiveness analysis of neonatal hearing screening program in china: should universal screening be prioritized? [J].
Huang, Li-Hui ;
Zhang, Luo ;
Tobe, Ruo-Yan Gai ;
Qi, Fang-Hua ;
Sun, Long ;
Teng, Yue ;
Ke, Qing-Lin ;
Mai, Fei ;
Zhang, Xue-Feng ;
Zhang, Mei ;
Yang, Ru-Lan ;
Tu, Lin ;
Li, Hong-Hui ;
Gu, Yan-Qing ;
Xu, Sai-Nan ;
Yue, Xiao-Yan ;
Li, Xiao-Dong ;
Qi, Bei-Er ;
Cheng, Xiao-Huan ;
Tang, Wei ;
Xu, Ling-Zhong ;
Han, De-Min .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2012, 12