The Accuracy of Measurements with Probability and Nonprobability Survey Samples: Replication and Extension

被引:95
作者
MacInnis, Bo [1 ]
Krosnick, Jon A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ho, Annabell S. [1 ]
Cho, Mu-Jung [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Commun, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Humanities & Social Sci, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Commun Polit Sci & Psychol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
INTERNET SURVEYS; SURVEY MODE; QUALITY; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1093/poq/nfy038
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Many studies in various countries have found that telephone and internet surveys of probability samples yielded data that were more accurate than internet surveys of nonprobability samples, but some authors have challenged this conclusion. This paper describes a replication and an expanded comparison of data collected in the United States, using a variety of probability and nonprobability sampling methods, using a set of 50 measures of 40 benchmark variables, larger than any used in the past, and assessing accuracy using a new metric for this literature: root mean squared error. Despite substantial drops in response rates since a prior comparison, the probability samples interviewed by telephone or the internet were the most accurate. Internet surveys of a probability sample combined with an opt-in sample were less accurate; least accurate were internet surveys of opt-in panel samples. These results were not altered by implementing poststratification using demographics.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 744
页数:38
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, NY TIMES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, STAND DEF FIN DISP C, V8th
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1986, Statist. Sci.
  • [4] Does Survey Mode Still Matter? Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison
    Ansolabehere, Stephen
    Schaffner, Brian F.
    [J]. POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2014, 22 (03) : 285 - 303
  • [5] Cooperative Survey Research
    Ansolabehere, Stephen
    Rivers, Douglas
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, VOL 16, 2013, 16 : 307 - 329
  • [6] Research Synthesis
    Baker, Reg
    Blumberg, Stephen J.
    Brick, J. Michael
    Couper, Mick P.
    Courtright, Melanie
    Dennis, J. Michael
    Dillman, Don
    Frankel, Martin R.
    Garland, Philip
    Groves, Robert M.
    Kennedy, Courtney
    Krosnick, Jon
    Lavrakas, Paul J.
    Lee, Sunghee
    Link, Michael
    Piekarski, Linda
    Rao, Kumar
    Thomas, Randall K.
    Zahs, Dan
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2010, 74 (04) : 711 - 781
  • [7] Baker Reg., 2013, Report of the AAPOR Task Force on Non-Probability Sampling, DOI DOI 10.1093/JSSAM/SMT008
  • [8] American Public Opinion in the 1930s and 1940s - The analysis of quota-controlled sample survey data
    Berinsky, Adam J.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2006, 70 (04) : 499 - 529
  • [9] Blom Annelies G., 2017, EFFECT SURVEY SAMPLI
  • [10] The Future of Survey Sampling
    Brick, J. Michael
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2011, 75 (05) : 872 - 888