The relationship between ISO/IEC 15504 process capability levels, ISO 9001 certification and organization size: An empirical study

被引:16
作者
Jung, HW
Hunter, R
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Business Adm, Sungbuk Gu, Seoul 136701, South Korea
[2] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Comp Sci, Glasgow G1 1XH, Lanark, Scotland
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
bootstrap; confidence interval; capability level; permutation test; ISO; 9001; certification; SPICE assessments;
D O I
10.1016/S0164-1212(01)00047-4
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The gradual spread in the use of ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 15504 (also known as software process improvement and capability determination (SPICE)) has raised questions such as "At what ISO/IEC 15504 capability level would one expect an ISO 9001 certified organization's processes to be?" and "Is there any significant difference between the ISO/IEC 15504 capability levels achieved by the processes of ISO 9001 certified organizations and those of non ISO 9001 certified organizations?". This paper provides answers to those questions as well as to the following question "Is there any significant difference in the capability levels achieved by the ISO/IEC 15504 processes of organizations with a large information technology (IT) staff and those with a small IT staff?" In order to answer these questions, we analyzed a data set including 691 process instances (PIs) taken from 70 SPICE phase 2 trial assessments performed over the two years from September 1996 to June 1998. Results show that the ISO/IEC 15504 processes of the ISO 9001 certified organizations attained capability levels of around 1-2.3 in 15504 terms. Results also show differences between the capability levels achieved by ISO 9001 certified organizations and non ISO 9001 certified organizations, as well as between organizations with a large IT staff and those with a small IT staff. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 55
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Agresti A., 1996, INTRO CATEGORICAL DA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, PERMUTATION TESTS PR
[3]  
Briand L., 1996, Empirical Software Engineering, V1, P61, DOI 10.1007/BF00125812
[4]  
Conte S.D., 1986, SOFTWARE ENG METRICS
[5]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
[6]   Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measure of software requirements analysis process capability [J].
El Emam, K ;
Birk, A .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2000, 26 (06) :541-566
[7]   Validating the ISO/IEC 15504 measures of software development process capability [J].
El Emam, K ;
Birk, A .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2000, 51 (02) :119-149
[8]   An empirical evaluation of the ISO/IEC 15504 assessment model [J].
El Emam, K ;
Jung, HW .
JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2001, 59 (01) :23-41
[9]  
El Emam K., 1998, SPICE THEORY PRACTIC
[10]  
ELEMAM K, 1999, BETTER SOFTWARE PRAC