Pulse Width Affects Scalp Sensation of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

被引:17
作者
Peterchev, Angel V. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Luber, Bruce [1 ]
Westin, Gregory G. [4 ]
Lisanby, Sarah H. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Endovasc Surg, New York, NY USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cTMS; Pulse width; Sensation; Scalp; Tolerability; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; STIMULUS-DURATION; COIL DESIGN; SHAM; PAIN; NEUROMODULATION; ACTIVATION; OUTPUT; NERVE; MOTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2016.09.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Scalp sensation and pain comprise the most common side effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), which can reduce tolerability and complicate experimental blinding. Objective: We explored whether changing the width of single TMS pulses affects the quality and tolerability of the resultant somatic sensation. Methods: Using a controllable pulse parameter TMS device with a figure-8 coil, single monophasic magnetic pulses inducing electric field with initial phase width of 30, 60, and 120 mu s were delivered in 23 healthy volunteers. Resting motor threshold of the right first dorsal interosseus was determined for each pulse width, as reported previously. Subsequently, pulses were delivered over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at each of the three pulse widths at two amplitudes (100% and 120% of the pulse-width specific motor threshold), with 20 repetitions per condition delivered in random order. After each pulse, subjects rated 0-to-10 visual analog scales for Discomfort, Sharpness, and Strength of the sensation. Results: Briefer TMS pulses with amplitude normalized to the motor threshold were perceived as slightly more uncomfortable than longer pulses (with an average 0.89 point increase on the Discomfort scale for pulse width of 30 mu s compared to 120 mu s). The sensation of the briefer pulses was felt to be substantially sharper (2.95 points increase for 30 mu s compared to 120 mu s pulse width), but not stronger than longer pulses. As expected, higher amplitude pulses increased the perceived discomfort and strength, and, to a lesser degree the perceived sharpness. Conclusions: Our findings contradict a previously published hypothesis that briefer TMS pulses are more tolerable. We discovered that the opposite is true, which merits further study as a means of enhancing tolerability in the context of repetitive TMS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 105
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Focal electrical stimulation as a sham control for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Does it truly mimic the cutaneous sensation and pain of active prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation? [J].
Arana, Ashley B. ;
Borckardt, Jeffery J. ;
Ricci, Raffaella ;
Anderson, Berry ;
Li, Xingbao ;
Linder, Katherine J. ;
Long, James ;
Sackeim, Harold A. ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2008, 1 (01) :44-51
[2]  
BARKER AT, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P227
[3]   Fifteen minutes of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation acutely increases thermal pain thresholds in healthy adults [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Smith, Arthur R. ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
Weinstein, Mitchell ;
Kozel, F. Andrew ;
Nahas, Ziad ;
Shelley, Neal ;
Branham, R. Kyle ;
Thomas, K. Jackson ;
George, Mark S. .
PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 12 (04) :287-290
[4]   The Painfulness of Active, but not Sham, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Decreases Rapidly Over Time: Results From the Double-Blind Phase of the OPT-TMS Trial [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Nahas, Ziad H. ;
Teal, John ;
Lisanby, Sarah H. ;
McDonald, William M. ;
Avery, David ;
Durkalski, Valerie ;
Pavlicova, Martina ;
Long, James M. ;
Sackeim, Harold A. ;
George, Mark S. .
BRAIN STIMULATION, 2013, 6 (06) :925-928
[5]   Reducing pain and unpleasantness during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Borckardt, Jeffrey J. ;
Smith, Arthur R. ;
Hutcheson, Kelby ;
Johnson, Kevin ;
Nahas, Ziad ;
Anderson, Berry ;
Schneider, M. Bret ;
Reeves, Scott T. ;
George, Mark S. .
JOURNAL OF ECT, 2006, 22 (04) :259-264
[6]   Effect of coil orientation on strength-duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
D'Ostilio, Kevin ;
Goetz, Stefan M. ;
Hannah, Ricci ;
Ciocca, Matteo ;
Chieffo, Raffaella ;
Chen, Jui-Cheng A. ;
Peterchev, Angel V. ;
Rothwell, John C. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 127 (01) :675-683
[7]   Suppressing the surface field during transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Davey, KR ;
Riehl, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (02) :190-194
[8]   Coil design considerations for deep transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Deng, Zhi-De ;
Lisanby, Sarah H. ;
Peterchev, Angel V. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 125 (06) :1202-1212
[9]  
Deng ZD, 2011, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P1993, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090561
[10]  
Gardner E.P., 2000, Principles of Neural Science, V4