Can we compare lichen diversity data? A test with skilled teams

被引:18
作者
Brunialti, G. [1 ]
Frati, L. [1 ]
Cristofolini, F. [2 ]
Chiarucci, A. [1 ,3 ]
Giordani, P. [4 ]
Loppi, S.
Benesperi, R. [5 ]
Cristofori, A. [2 ]
Critelli, P. [6 ]
Di Capua, E. [6 ]
Genovesi, V. [7 ]
Gottardini, E. [2 ]
Innocenti, G. [6 ]
Munzi, S.
Paoli, L.
Pisani, T.
Ravera, S. [7 ]
Ferretti, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Siena, TerraData Environmetr, Monterotondo M Mo, GR, Italy
[2] Fdn Edmund Mach, IASMA Res & Innovat Ctr, Sustainable Agroecosyst & Bioresources Dept, I-38010 San Michele All Adige, TN, Italy
[3] Univ Siena, Dept Environm Sci G Sarfatti, Biodivers & Conservat Network, BIOCONNET, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[4] Univ Genoa, DIP TE RIS, I-16136 Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Florence, Lab Biol Vegetate, Dipartimento Biol Evoluzionist, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[6] ARPAT, I-50144 Florence, Italy
[7] Univ Molise, Dept STAT, I-86090 Pesche, IS, Italy
关键词
Biomonitoring; Epiphytic lichens; Quality assurance; Sources of variability; Standard operating procedures; SPECIES RICHNESS; STANDARDIZATION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.05.007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Epiphytic lichens have long been used as ecological indicators. Lichen biomonitoring surveys were carried out by five experienced teams and the results compared across the entire process, from sampling design planning to species counting. The five teams received the same background information and worked in parallel but independently in the same area. European standard operating procedures (SOPs), which are still in preparation, were followed in order to identify possible critical issues and improve consistency. Five exercises with progressive reduction in the degree of operational freedom were carried out by the teams. The results revealed differences between teams on each exercise and showed that investigations run by different teams in the same area and at the same time may not be entirely comparable. This was partly due to inherent differences between crews (skills, familiarity with local flora, and accuracy in applying SOPs), partly to ambiguities in the SOPs, and partly to insufficient training with the SOPs. The results may be valuable in improving biomonitoring procedures and in achieving high-quality, consistent lichen diversity data. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
AFNOR, 2008, X43903 AFNOR NF
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, VDI DIN HDB REINHA A, V2
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, MONITORING PLANT ANI
[4]  
ANPA, 2001, IBL IND BIOD LICH
[5]  
Asta J, 2002, NATO SCI S SS IV EAR, V7, P273
[6]  
Barazzuoli P, 1993, STORIA NATURALE TOSC, P140
[7]   Performance of macrolichens and lichen genera as indicators of lichen species richness and composition [J].
Bergamini, A ;
Scheidegger, C ;
Stofer, S ;
Carvalho, P ;
Davey, S ;
Dietrich, M ;
Dubs, F ;
Farkas, E ;
Groner, U ;
Kärkkäinen, K ;
Keller, C ;
Lökös, L ;
Lommi, S ;
Máguas, C ;
Mitchell, R ;
Pinho, P ;
Rico, VJ ;
Aragón, G ;
Truscott, AM ;
Wolseley, P ;
Watt, A .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (04) :1051-1062
[8]   Evaluation of data quality in lichen biomonitoring studies: The Italian experience [J].
Brunialti, G ;
Giordani, P ;
Isocrono, D ;
Loppi, S .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2002, 75 (03) :271-280
[9]  
Brunialti G, 2004, ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, P443, DOI 10.1201/9780203495476.ch20
[10]  
Cochran W.G., 2007, Sampling techniques