Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors

被引：65
作者：
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri [1 ,2 ]
Ayvazyan, Lilit [3 ]
Kitas, George D. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Russells Hall Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Dept Rheumatol, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, England
[2] Russells Hall Hosp, Clin Res Unit, Dept Res & Dev, Dudley Grp NHS Fdn Trust, Dudley DY1 2HQ, England
[3] Yerevan State Med Univ, Dept Med Chem, Yerevan, Armenia
[4] Univ Manchester, Arthrit Res UK Epidemiol Unit, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源：
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL | 2013年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词：
Authorship; Editorial policies; Periodicals as topic; Research standards; EQUAL CONTRIBUTIONS; BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS; GHOST AUTHORSHIP; HONORARY; PREVALENCE; CREDIT; CONTRIBUTORSHIP; PUBLICATIONS; PUBLISH; ORDER;
D O I：
10.1007/s00296-012-2582-2
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Authorship problems in scholarly journals shake the foundations of research, diminish scientific quality of papers and devalue records of citation tracking services. The 'Publish or Perish' mantra is thought to drive some instances of unfair, honorary authorship, particularly in countries of emerging scientific power. Though causes of honorary, gift, guest and ghost authorship are still ill-defined, it is possible to avoid some of these instances by improving awareness of what constitutes authorship and by adhering to the editorial policies of learned associations. This paper overviews common cases of inappropriate authorship and suggests options to solve related problems by authors, reviewers and editors of scholarly journals.
引用
收藏
页码：277 / 284
页数：8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Authorship problems in scholarly journals: considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2013, 33 : 277 - 284
  • [2] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Armen Yuri Gasparyan
    Lilit Ayvazyan
    Heather Blackmore
    George D. Kitas
    Rheumatology International, 2011, 31
  • [3] Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    Ayvazyan, Lilit
    Blackmore, Heather
    Kitas, George D.
    RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 31 (11) : 1409 - 1417
  • [4] Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors
    Bormann de Souza Filho, Breno Augusto
    Tritany, Erika Fernandes
    Struchiner, Claudio Jose
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2022, 56
  • [5] Authorship and Contributorship in Scholarly Journals
    Gasparyan, Armen Yuri
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2013, 28 (06) : 801 - 802
  • [6] Scholarly publishing depends on peer reviewers
    Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
    PHARMACY PRACTICE-GRANADA, 2018, 16 (01):
  • [7] Guidelines for authors in Croatian scholarly journals
    Grgic, Ivana Hebrang
    Cackovic, Lorena
    INFORMATION DISCOVERY AND DELIVERY, 2018, 46 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [8] Authorship Considerations for Publishing in Pharmacy Education Journals
    Minshew, Lana M.
    McLaughlin, Jacqueline E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2019, 83 (06) : 1189 - 1199
  • [9] ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and scientific writing: What authors, peer reviewers and editors should know
    Misra, Durga Prasanna
    Chandwar, Kunal
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS OF EDINBURGH, 2023, 53 (02) : 90 - 93
  • [10] Open Editors: A dataset of scholarly journals' editorial board positions
    Nishikawa-Pacher, Andreas
    Heck, Tamara
    Schoch, Kerstin
    RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2023, 32 (02) : 228 - 243
123