Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy among pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer

被引:10
|
作者
Oh, Jong Jin [1 ]
Hong, Sung Kyu [1 ]
Byun, Seok-Soo [1 ]
Choe, Gheeyoung [2 ]
Lee, Sang Bun [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Urol, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Bundang Hosp, Dept Pathol, Songnam, South Korea
关键词
Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms; Prostatectomy; Surgical margins; EXTRAPROSTATIC EXTENSION; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CAPSULAR INCISION; DISEASE; PROGRESSION; IMPACT; ADENOCARCINOMA; PREDICTOR; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.05.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (PSM)s among patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) for pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer. Patients and methods: We reviewed the records of 658 patients who were revealed to have pT2 and pT3a prostate cancer after undergoing RP without neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. For our analysis, patients were subgrouped as the following: group 1: 406 (61.7%) with negative surgical margins (NSM)s and no extracapsular extension of tumor (BCE); group 2: 99 (15.0%) with PSMs and no ECE; group 3: 63 (9.6%) with NSMs and BCE; and group 4: 90 (13.7%) with PSMs and BCE. The effects of various variables on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival were assessed via uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: During median follow-up of 36 months, group 1 had significantly higher BCR-free survival compared with the other 3 groups (P < 0.001). However, no significant differences in BCR-free survivals were observed among the group 2, 3, and 4 (all P > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, PSM (P = 0.009) was observed to be significantly associated with BCR-free survival among groups 1 and 2 combined. Among groups 3 and 4, pathologic Gleason score (P = 0.002), but not PSM (P = 0.668), was the only significant predictor for BCR-free survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: According to our results, PSM is significantly associated with biochemical outcome after RP in pT2 prostate cancer. Meanwhile, patients with pT2 tumor and PSM appear to have comparable biochemical outcome compared with those with stage pT3a tumor independent of their marginal status. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 600
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in patients with extraprostatic carcinoma after radical prostatectomy
    Kausik, SJ
    Blute, ML
    Sebo, TJ
    Leibovich, BC
    Bergstralh, EJ
    Slezak, J
    Zincke, H
    CANCER, 2002, 95 (06) : 1215 - 1219
  • [22] PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
    OHORI, M
    WHEELER, TM
    KATTAN, MW
    GOTO, Y
    SCARDINO, PT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (05) : 1818 - 1824
  • [23] RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY. DETAILED SURGICAL MARGINS. VALUE PREDICTED OF THE MULTIFOCAL INVOLVEMENT IN pT2 WITH AFFECTED MARGINS
    Algarra, Ruben
    Merino, Imanol
    Hevia, Mateo
    Maria Velis, Jose
    Tienza, Antonio
    Zudaire, Javier
    Rosell, David
    Enrique Robles, Jose
    Diez-Caballero, Fernando
    Pascual, Ignacio
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (03): : 249 - 258
  • [24] The Length of a Positive Surgical Margin Is of Prognostic Significance in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
    Servoll, Einar
    Vlatkovic, Ljiljana
    Saeter, Thorstein
    Nesland, Jahn M.
    Axcrona, Ulrika
    Waaler, Gudmund
    Axcrona, Karol
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2014, 93 (03) : 289 - 295
  • [25] Bilateral Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Associates with the Presence of Extracapsular Disease and Positive Surgical Margins in Low Risk Patients: A Consideration for Bilateral Nerve Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Decision
    Sfoungaristos, Stavros
    Perimenis, Petros
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 10 (03) : 966 - 972
  • [26] Minimal Residual Disease Defines the Risk and Time to Biochemical Failure in Patients with Pt2 and Pt3a Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: An Observational Prospective Study
    Murray, Nigel P.
    Aedo, Socrates
    Fuentealba, Cynthia
    Reyes, Eduardo
    Salazar, Anibal
    Lopez, Marco Antonio
    Minzer, Simona
    Orrego, Shenda
    Guzman, Eghon
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 17 (03) : 262 - 270
  • [27] Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Godoy, Guilherme
    Tareen, Basir U.
    Lepor, Herbert
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 104 (11) : 1610 - 1614
  • [28] Positive Surgical Margins After Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Study
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Orvieto, Marcelo
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Kameh, Darien
    Santoro, Luigi
    Coughlin, Geoff D.
    Liss, Michael
    Jeong, Wooju
    Malcolm, John
    Stern, Joshua M.
    Sharma, Saurabh
    Zorn, Kevin C.
    Shikanov, Sergey
    Shalhav, Arieh L.
    Zagaja, Gregory P.
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Rha, Koon H.
    Albala, David M.
    Fabrizio, Michael D.
    Lee, David I.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02) : 511 - 516
  • [29] Prognostic value of unifocal and multifocal positive surgical margins in a large series of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer
    Keller, Etienne Xavier
    Bachofner, Jacqueline
    Britschgi, Anna Jelena
    Saba, Karim
    Mortezavi, Ashkan
    Kaufmann, Basil
    Fankhauser, Christian D.
    Wild, Peter
    Sulser, Tullio
    Hermanns, Thomas
    Eberli, Daniel
    Poyet, Cedric
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 1837 - 1844
  • [30] Predictors of Biochemical Recurrence in pT3b Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Without Adjuvant Radiotherapy
    Pagano, Matthew J.
    Whalen, Michael J.
    Paulucci, David J.
    Reddy, Balaji N.
    Matulay, Justin T.
    Rothberg, Michael
    Scarberry, Kyle
    Patel, Trushar
    Shapiro, Edan Y.
    RoyChoudhury, Arindam
    McKiernan, James
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    PROSTATE, 2016, 76 (02) : 226 - 234