Online measurement of alkalinity in anaerobic co-digestion using linear regression method

被引:8
作者
Bai Xue
Li Zifu [1 ]
Wang Xuemei
He Xi
Cheng Shikun
Bai Xiaofeng
Gao Ruiling
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, 30 Xueyuan Rd, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
anaerobic digestion; alkalinity; online measurement; model; linear regression; FLUIDIZED-BED REACTOR; WASTE-WATER;
D O I
10.3965/j.ijabe.20171001.2701
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Alkalinity is a reliable indicator of process stability in anaerobic digestion system. Total alkalinity (TA) and partial alkalinity (PA) are usually monitored offline as indicators for the status of anaerobic digestion process. In order to online monitor TA and PA, the linear regression method was used as estimator to predict alkalinity via software sensor method. Parameters, namely, pH, oxidation and reduction potential (ORP), and electrical conductivity (EC), were used as input variables. EC was the most significant parameter with TA and PA. Multiple linear regression (MLR) models and simple linear regression models with EC were constructed to predict TA and PA in anaerobic co-digestion system. On the basis of the evaluation of prediction accuracy, the applications of linear regression models were better for monitoring PA than TA. MLR models provided higher accuracy for alkalinity prediction than simple linear regression models. The two MLR models based on single-phase anaerobic digestion system were also feasible to predict TA in anaerobic co-digestion systems. However, the accuracy of these models should be improved by calibrating for broad applications of linear regression method in online alkalinity measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 183
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]   An automated spectrophotometric system for monitoring buffer capacity in anaerobic digestion processes [J].
Jantsch, TG ;
Mattiasson, B .
WATER RESEARCH, 2004, 38 (17) :3645-3650
[12]   A simple spectrophotometric method based on pH-indications for monitoring partial and total alkalinity in anaerobic processes [J].
Jantsch, TG ;
Mattiasson, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 24 (09) :1061-1067
[13]  
JENKINS SR, 1991, RES J WATER POLLUT C, V63, P28
[14]   Titration methodologies for monitoring of anaerobic digestion in developing countries - a review [J].
Lahav, O ;
Morgan, BE .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 79 (12) :1331-1341
[15]  
Lipps W C., 2018, Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, DOI [DOI 10.2105/SMWW.2882.023, 10.2105/SMWW.2882.023]
[16]   Monitoring of anaerobic digestion processes: A review perspective [J].
Madsen, Michael ;
Holm-Nielsen, Jens Bo ;
Esbensen, Kim H. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2011, 15 (06) :3141-3155
[17]  
McCarty P.L., 1964, ENV REQUIREMENTS CON, V95, P123
[18]   Oxidation reduction potential as a parameter to regulate micro-oxygen injection into anaerobic digester for reducing hydrogen sulphide concentration in biogas [J].
Nghiem, Long D. ;
Manassa, Patrick ;
Dawson, Marcia ;
Fitzgerald, Shona K. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 173 :443-447
[19]  
Palacios-Ruiz B., 2008, WORLD C, V67, P13611
[20]  
RIPLEY LE, 1986, J WATER POLLUT CON F, V58, P406