Influencing governance of a public-private partnership in plant genomics: The societal interface group as a new instrument for public involvement

被引:3
作者
Hanssen, Lucien
Gremmen, Bart [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Ctr Method Eth & Technol Assessment, NL-6700 HB Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
governance; plant genomics; public involvement; societal interface group; TECHNOLOGY; ENGAGEMENT; SCIENCE; PARTICIPATION; EXERCISES; TRUST; TALK;
D O I
10.1177/0963662511432673
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The Centre for BioSystems Genomics (CBSG) is a Dutch public-private partnership in plant genomics active in potato and tomato research and exploitation. Its Societal Interface Group (SIG) has been developed to inform its communication strategy and governance practice. This new instrument identifies and discusses early signals from society by bringing together people from different societal backgrounds with members of CBSG management. This interactive learning process facilitates the inclusion of public concerns and needs in scientific developments in the field of plant genomics, and simultaneously enables genomics scientists to search for more societal aims, meanings, and starting points for their research agenda. Analysis of the SIG sessions revealed that the input of public expertise is not threatening or irrational, but provides the opportunity to harness the creative potential of future users highly relevant for the development of societal practices in which plant genomics plays a role.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 729
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[21]   Public engagement to build trust: false hopes? [J].
Petts, Judith .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2008, 11 (06) :821-835
[22]   Meaningful citizen engagement in science and technology - What would it really take? [J].
Powell, Maria C. ;
Colin, Mathilde .
SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2008, 30 (01) :126-136
[23]   A typology of public engagement mechanisms [J].
Rowe, G ;
Frewer, LJ .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2005, 30 (02) :251-290
[24]   Evaluating public-participation exercises: A research agenda [J].
Rowe, G ;
Frewer, LJ .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2004, 29 (04) :512-557
[25]   Analysis of a normative framework for evaluating public engagement exercises: reliability, validity and limitations [J].
Rowe, Gene ;
Horlick-Jones, Tom ;
Walls, John ;
Poortinga, Wouter ;
Pidgeon, Nick F. .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2008, 17 (04) :419-441
[26]   Stimulating authentic community involvement in biotechnology policy in Australia [J].
Schibeci, Renato ;
Harwood, Jeffrey .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2007, 16 (02) :245-255
[27]   Opening up and "Closing down" - Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology [J].
Stirling, Andy .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2008, 33 (02) :262-294
[28]   Science in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes [J].
Sturgis, P ;
Allum, N .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2004, 13 (01) :55-74
[29]   Consumers' images regarding genomics as a tomato breeding technology: "maybe it can provide a more tasty tomato" [J].
van den Heuvel, Timon ;
Renes, Reint Jan ;
Gremmen, Bart ;
van Woerkum, Cees ;
van Trijp, Hans .
EUPHYTICA, 2008, 159 (1-2) :207-216
[30]  
Van Est R, 2003, TECHNIKFOLGENABSCHAT, V12, P100