Next-Generation Sequencing of Lung Cancer EGFR Exons 18-21 Allows Effective Molecular Diagnosis of Small Routine Samples (Cytology and Biopsy)

被引:58
作者
de Biase, Dario [1 ]
Visani, Michela [2 ]
Malapelle, Umberto [3 ]
Simonato, Francesca [4 ]
Cesari, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Bellevicine, Claudio [3 ]
Pession, Annalisa [2 ]
Troncone, Giancarlo [3 ]
Fassina, Ambrogio [4 ]
Tallini, Giovanni [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Bellaria Hosp, Dept Med DIMES, Anat Pathol Unit, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Pharmacol & Biotechnol FaBiT, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Naples Federico II, Dept Publ Hlth, Naples, Italy
[4] Univ Padua, Dept Med DIMED, Surg Pathol & Cytopathol Unit, Padua, Italy
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 12期
关键词
GROWTH-FACTOR-RECEPTOR; MUTATION-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES; PROCESS VERSION 2; REAL-TIME PCR; ACQUIRED-RESISTANCE; KRAS MUTATIONS; OPEN-LABEL; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; EUROPEAN PATIENTS; BRAF MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0083607
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Selection of lung cancer patients for therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors directed at EGFR requires the identification of specific EGFR mutations. In most patients with advanced, inoperable lung carcinoma limited tumor samples often represent the only material available for both histologic typing and molecular analysis. We defined a next generation sequencing protocol targeted to EGFR exons 18-21 suitable for the routine diagnosis of such clinical samples. The protocol was validated in an unselected series of 80 small biopsies (n=14) and cytology (n=66) specimens representative of the material ordinarily submitted for diagnostic evaluation to three referral medical centers in Italy. Specimens were systematically evaluated for tumor cell number and proportion relative to nonneoplastic cells. They were analyzed in batches of 100-150 amplicons per run, reaching an analytical sensitivity of 1% and obtaining an adequate number of reads, to cover all exons on all samples analyzed. Next generation sequencing was compared with Sanger sequencing. The latter identified 15 EGFR mutations in 14/80 cases (17.5%) but did not detected mutations when the proportion of neoplastic cells was below 40%. Next generation sequencing identified 31 EGFR mutations in 24/80 cases (30.0%). Mutations were detected with a proportion of neoplastic cells as low as 5%. All mutations identified by the Sanger method were confirmed. In 6 cases next generation sequencing identified exon 19 deletions or the L858R mutation not seen after Sanger sequencing, allowing the patient to be treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In one additional case the R831H mutation associated with treatment resistance was identified in an EGFR wild type tumor after Sanger sequencing. Next generation sequencing is robust, cost-effective and greatly improves the detection of EGFR mutations. Its use should be promoted for the clinical diagnosis of mutations in specimens with unfavorable tumor cell content.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Molecular Pathology of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer A Practical Guide
    Aisner, Dara L.
    Marshall, Carrie B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2012, 138 (03) : 332 - 346
  • [2] Low copy number DNA template can render polymerase chain reaction error prone in a sequence-dependent manner
    Akbari, M
    Hansen, MD
    Halgunset, J
    Skorpen, F
    Krokan, HE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2005, 7 (01) : 36 - 39
  • [3] 454 next generation-sequencing outperforms allele-specific PCR, Sanger sequencing, and pyrosequencing for routine KRAS mutation analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples
    Altimari, Annalisa
    de Biase, Dario
    De Maglio, Giovanna
    Gruppioni, Elisa
    Capizzi, Elisa
    Degiovanni, Alessio
    D'Errico, Antonia
    Pession, Annalisa
    Pizzolitto, Stefano
    Fiorentino, Michelangelo
    Tallini, Giovanni
    [J]. ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2013, 6 : 1057 - 1064
  • [4] A Comparison of EGFR Mutation Testing Methods in Lung Carcinoma: Direct Sequencing, Real-time PCR and Immunohistochemistry
    Angulo, Barbara
    Conde, Esther
    Suarez-Gauthier, Ana
    Plaza, Carlos
    Martinez, Rebeca
    Redondo, Pilar
    Izquierdo, Elisa
    Rubio-Viqueira, Belen
    Paz-Ares, Luis
    Hidalgo, Manuel
    Lopez-Rios, Fernando
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (08):
  • [5] A Commercial Real-Time PCR Kit Provides Greater Sensitivity than Direct Sequencing to Detect KRAS Mutations A Morphology-Based Approach in Colorectal Carcinoma
    Angulo, Barbara
    Garcia-Garcia, Elena
    Martinez, Rebeca
    Suarez-Gauthier, Ana
    Conde, Esther
    Hidalgo, Manuel
    Lopez-Rios, Fernando
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2010, 12 (03) : 292 - 299
  • [6] [Anonymous], WHO PATHOLOGY GENETI
  • [7] [Anonymous], J CLIN ONCOL S
  • [8] Clinical screening assay for EGFR exon 19 mutations using PNA-clamp smart amplification process version 2 in lung adenocarcinoma
    Araki, Takuya
    Shimizu, Kimihiro
    Nakamura, Tomonori
    Baba, Masaru
    Kawai, Yuki
    Nakamura, Katsunori
    Mitani, Yasumasa
    Obayashi, Kyoko
    Aomori, Tohru
    Fujita, Yukiyoshi
    Miyamae, Yohei
    Kakegawa, Seiichi
    Kaira, Kyoichi
    Lezhava, Alexander
    Hayashizaki, Yoshihide
    Takeyoshi, Izumi
    Yamamoto, Koujirou
    [J]. ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2011, 26 (05) : 1213 - 1219
  • [9] Detection of KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Colorectal Carcinoma Roles for High-Sensitivity Locked Nucleic Acid-PCR Sequencing and Broad-Spectrum Mass Spectrometry Genotyping
    Arcila, Maria
    Lau, Christopher
    Nafa, Khedoudja
    Ladanyi, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2011, 13 (01) : 64 - 73
  • [10] Novel D761Y and common secondary T790M mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor - Mutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors
    Balak, Marissa N.
    Gong, Yixuan
    Riely, Gregory J.
    Somwar, Romel
    Li, Allan R.
    Zakowski, Maureen F.
    Chiang, Anne
    Yang, Guangli
    Ouerfelli, Ouathek
    Kris, Mark G.
    Ladanyi, Marc
    Miller, Vincent A.
    Pao, William
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (21) : 6494 - 6501