Endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein with ultrasound-guided perivenous tumescence: early and midterm results

被引:8
作者
Chen Jia-quan [1 ]
Xie Hui [1 ]
Deng Hao-yu [1 ]
Yuan Kai [1 ]
Zhang Ji-wei [1 ]
Zhang Hao [1 ]
Zhang Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Renji Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Shanghai 200127, Peoples R China
关键词
endovenous laser ablation; great saphenous vein; occlusion; tumescent anaesthesia; CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY; REFLUX;
D O I
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20122290
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is an improved method to treat varicose great saphenous veins (GSV) with a high satisfactory rate. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and safety of treatment by EVLA procedures with ultrasound-guided perivenous tumescence. Methods Thirty-one patients (31 limbs) with symptomatic varicose vein primary to chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) treated with EVLA were prospectively studied. The entire procedure was performed under ultrasound-guided tumescent local anesthesia. The patients were evaluated with a 18 month follow-up postoperation using clinical examination and venous duplex ultrasonography. Pain scores and quality of life (QOL) were recorded using visual analog scale (VAS) and the chronic venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) at 1 week, 1 month, and 12 months after operation. Results All patients tolerated EVLA procedure well. The overall success occlusion rates of GSV were 92%, 94%, and 94% at 1, 12, and 18 months follow-up, respectively. The score of CIVIQ one week preoperation was 69.14 +/- 11.44 while that of CIVIQ one month postoperation was 85.32 +/- 4.89. The life quality has significantly improved after the operation of EVLA (t=12.71, P < 0.05). The VAS one month after treatment was lower than 1 week before therapy (t=8.048, P < 0.05). Major complications such as deep vein thrombosis and skin burns were not found. Most of the complications were minor and improved quickly. Conclusions This refinement type of EVLA procedure is a safe and effective treatment with a high satisfaction rate; it displayed noteworthy features including shortening hospitalization, early ambulant activity, and preferable occlusion rates.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 425
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Validation of the Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality of Life Questionnaire in Dutch Patients Treated for Varicose Veins [J].
Biemans, A. A. M. ;
van der Velden, S. K. ;
Bruijninckx, C. M. A. ;
Buth, J. ;
Nijsten, T. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 42 (02) :246-253
[2]   Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins [J].
Darwood, R. J. ;
Theivacumar, N. ;
Dellagrammaticas, D. ;
Mavor, A. I. D. ;
Gough, M. J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) :294-301
[3]   Late recurrent saphenofemoral junction reflux after ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein [J].
Fischer, R ;
Linde, N ;
Duff, C ;
Jeanneret, C ;
Chandler, JG ;
Seeber, P .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (02) :236-240
[4]   Tumescent anesthesia in ambulatory phlebectomy: Addition of epinephrine [J].
Keel, D ;
Goldman, MP .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 1999, 25 (05) :371-372
[5]   Radiofrequency Ablation: Evolution of a Treatment [J].
Lohr, Joann ;
Kulwicki, Aaron .
SEMINARS IN VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 23 (02) :90-100
[6]  
Luebke T, 2008, J CARDIOVASC SURG, V49, P213
[7]  
Millien J P, 1993, Phlebologie, V46, P583
[8]   Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: Long-term results [J].
Min, RJ ;
Khilnani, N ;
Zimmet, SE .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2003, 14 (08) :991-996
[9]   Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins [J].
Mundy, L ;
Merlin, TL ;
Fitridge, RA ;
Hiller, JE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 92 (10) :1189-1194
[10]   Invagination Stripping with Ultrasound-Guided Perivenous Tumescence: An Original Method of Great Saphenous Vein Stripping [J].
Neser, Rogerio Abdo ;
Caffaro, Roberto Augusto .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2011, 37 (03) :349-352