Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study

被引:27
作者
Fisher, Stacey [1 ]
Yasui, Yutaka [1 ]
Dabbs, Kelly [2 ]
Winget, Marcy [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Sch Publ Hlth, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Surg, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, 1265 Welch Rd,Room X214, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
来源
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH | 2018年 / 18卷
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Breast cancer surgery; Breast conserving surgery; Population-based; Re-excision; Survival; LOCAL RECURRENCE; CONSERVATION THERAPY; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; MARGIN STATUS; MASTECTOMY; DISEASE; IMPACT; RISK; IRRADIATION; REEXCISION;
D O I
10.1186/s12913-018-2882-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Increasing population-based evidence suggests that patients who receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy have superior survival than those who receive mastectomy. It is unclear, however, how BCS followed by re-excision is associated with all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality, and whether the BCS survival advantage is maintained if re-excision is needed. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical, patient, provider and geographic variation associated with receipt of re-excision surgery, and to examine the relationship between re-excision and all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality. Methods: All women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in Alberta, Canada from 2002 to 2009 were identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry, of which 11,626 were eligible for study inclusion. Type of first breast cancer surgery after diagnosis, subsequent re-excisions within 1 year, surgeon (anonymized), and hospital were obtained from provincial physician claims data. Multilevel logistic regression with surgeons and hospitals as crossed random effects was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios of re-excision by the factors of interest. Poisson regression models were fitted to compare all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality by surgical pattern. Results: Re-excision surgery was received by 19% (N = 5659) of patients who initially received BCS. The adjusted odds of re-excision varied significantly by geography of surgery, and by individual surgeon among stage I and II patients beyond the variation explained by the factors investigated (Stage I OR standard deviation (SD) = 0.43; stage II OR SD = 0.39). Patients who were treated with BCS plus re-excision surgery with either mastectomy or further BCS had similar all-cause and breast cancer-specific mortality as those treated with BCS without re-excision. Conclusion: These results suggest that breast cancer patients who are treated with BCS plus re-excision surgery by either mastectomy or further BCS have similar survival as those treated with BCS without re-excision. The significant variation in the likelihood of re-excision by geography and by individual surgeon is concerning, especially given the costs to the patient associated with additional surgery and the financial costs to the health system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The Role of Margin Status and Reexcision in Local Recurrence Following Breast Conservation Surgery [J].
Adams, Barbara J. ;
Zoon, Christine K. ;
Stevenson, Christina ;
Chitnavis, Padma ;
Wolfe, Luke ;
Bear, Harry D. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 20 (07) :2250-2255
[2]   Effect of Breast Conservation Therapy vs Mastectomy on Disease-Specific Survival for Early-Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Agarwal, Shailesh ;
Pappas, Lisa ;
Neumayer, Leigh ;
Kokeny, Kristine ;
Agarwal, Jayant .
JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) :267-274
[3]   The Impact of Re-Excision and Residual Disease on Local Recurrence After Breast Conservation Treatment for Patients With Early Stage Breast Cancer [J].
Ali, Ahmed N. ;
Vapiwala, Neha ;
Guo, Mengye ;
Hwang, Wei-Ting ;
Harris, Eleanor E. ;
Solin, Lawrence J. .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2011, 11 (06) :400-405
[4]   The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer [J].
Aziz, Dalal ;
Rawlinson, Ellen ;
Narod, Steven A. ;
Sun, Ping ;
Lickley, H. Lavina A. ;
McCready, David R. ;
Holloway, Claire M. B. .
BREAST JOURNAL, 2006, 12 (04) :331-337
[5]   The Influence of Repeat Surgery and Residual Disease on Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study [J].
Bodilsen, Anne ;
Bjerre, Karsten ;
Offersen, Birgitte V. ;
Vahl, Pernille ;
Ejlertsen, Bent ;
Overgaard, Jens ;
Christiansen, Peer .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 22 :S476-S485
[6]   Comparative effectiveness study of breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy in the general population: A NCDB analysis [J].
Chen, Kai ;
Liu, Jieqiong ;
Zhu, Liling ;
Su, Fengxi ;
Song, Erwei ;
Jacobs, Lisa K. .
ONCOTARGET, 2015, 6 (37) :40127-40140
[7]  
Comber H, 2013, BREAST CANC RES TREA, P1
[8]   Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Anderson, S ;
Bryant, J ;
Margolese, RG ;
Deutsch, M ;
Fisher, ER ;
Jeong, J ;
Wolmark, N .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (16) :1233-1241
[9]   Survival in stage I-III breast cancer patients by surgical treatment in a publicly funded health care system [J].
Fisher, S. ;
Gao, H. ;
Yasui, Y. ;
Dabbs, K. ;
Winget, M. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (06) :1161-1169
[10]   Using Multilevel Models to Explain Variation in Clinical Practice: Surgeon Volume and the Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer [J].
Fisher, Stacey ;
Yasui, Yutaka ;
Dabbs, Kelly ;
Winget, Marcy .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 23 (06) :1845-1851