Radial artery diameter decreases with increased femoral to radial arterial pressure gradient during cardiopulmonary bypass

被引:37
作者
Baba, T
Goto, T
Yoshitake, A
Shibata, Y
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, Kumamoto
[2] Department of Anesthesiology, Kumamoto Chuo Hospital, Kumamoto 862
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199708000-00003
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A clinically significant femoral to radial artery pressure gradient sometimes develops during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but the mechanism responsible is not clear. We investigated when the pressure gradient developed and what mechanism could be responsible by comparing mean femoral to mean radial artery pressure and radial artery diameter in 75 male patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. A pressure gradient greater than or equal to 5 mm Hg (High-P) occurred in 38 patients, and the remaining 37 patients had pressure gradients <5 mm Hg (Low-P) at sternal closure. In High-P group, the pressure gradient was significantly greater (4.8 +/- 3.1 vs 1.0 +/- 3.1 mm Hg; P < 0.001) than in Low-P group, and the ratio of radial artery diameter to the diameter after induction of anesthesia was significantly decreased (0.79 +/- 0.12 vs 0.87 +/- 0.14; P = 0.006) at 5 min after aortic clamping. The pressure gradient and the arterial diameter changes persisted until sternal closure. There was a negative linear correlation between the pressure gradient (Delta P) and the radial artery diameter ratio (D) at sternal closure (D = -15.0 Delta P + 16.6, r = 0.39, P < 0.001). In a subgroup of 11 High-P patients, palm temperature was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that of 11 Low-P patient during and after CPB. We conclude that the femoral to radial artery pressure gradient develops by 5 min after aortic clamping during CPB and persists until sternal closure, and that radial artery constriction could be responsible for the pressure gradient. Implications: A femoral to radial pressure gradient has been observed after cardiopulmonary bypass. Arterial vasodilation and vasoconstriction have been considered as causes for this gradient, We measured radial artery diameter using pulsed Doppler ultrasound and examined radial artery vasodilation versus vaso constriction as possible mechanisms for the pressure gradient.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] REVIVAL OF THE RADIAL ARTERY FOR CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-GRAFTING
    ACAR, C
    JEBARA, VA
    PORTOGHESE, M
    BEYSSEN, B
    PAGNY, JY
    GRARE, P
    CHACHQUES, JC
    FABIANI, JN
    DELOCHE, A
    GUERMONPREZ, JL
    CARPENTIER, AF
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1992, 54 (04) : 652 - 660
  • [2] ALEXANDER RS, 1953, SURGERY, V33, P42
  • [3] COMPARISON OF BRACHIAL AND RADIAL ARTERIAL-PRESSURE MONITORING IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CORONARY-ARTERY BYPASS-SURGERY
    BAZARAL, MG
    WELCH, M
    GOLDING, LAR
    BADHWAR, K
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [4] CENTRAL-TO-PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL-PRESSURE GRADIENT DURING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS - RELATION TO PREOPERATIVE AND INTRAOPERATIVE DATA AND EFFECTS OF VASOACTIVE AGENTS
    DEHERT, SG
    VERMEYEN, M
    MOENS, MM
    HOFFMAN, VL
    BATAILLIE, KJ
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1994, 38 (05) : 479 - 485
  • [5] DOBRIN PB, 1983, HDB PHYSL 2, V3, P71
  • [6] THE CATECHOLAMINE, CORTISOL, AND HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSES TO MILD PERIOPERATIVE HYPOTHERMIA - A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    FRANK, SM
    HIGGINS, MS
    BRESLOW, MJ
    FLEISHER, LA
    GORMAN, RB
    SITZMANN, JV
    RAFF, H
    BEATTIE, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (01) : 83 - 93
  • [7] DIRECT BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT - DYNAMIC-RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS
    GARDNER, RM
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (03) : 227 - 236
  • [8] GORDON RJ, 1975, ANESTH ANALG, V54, P482
  • [9] Gravlee G P, 1989, J Cardiothorac Anesth, V3, P20, DOI 10.1016/0888-6296(89)90006-9
  • [10] PLASMA NOREPINEPHRINE CONCENTRATIONS DURING RESUSCITATION IN THE DOG
    HUYGHENS, LP
    CALLE, PA
    MOERMAN, EJ
    BUYLAERT, WA
    BOGAERT, MG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1991, 9 (05) : 426 - 431