Towards an improved understanding of project stakeholder landscapes

被引:71
作者
Aaltonen, Kirsi [1 ]
Kujala, Jaakko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Ind Engn & Management, POB 4610, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
关键词
Project stakeholder landscapes; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder theory; Complexity; Uncertainty; Dynamism; Institutional context; INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS; CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT; COMPLEXITY; STRATEGIES; FRAMEWORK; SYSTEMS; PERSPECTIVE; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Understanding stakeholders, their influences and devising engagement strategies based on the analyses of stakeholder landscapes has become one of the key capabilities within project-based firms. Based on a systematic literature review of the project stakeholder management literature, we develop a conceptual framework for characterizing and classifying project stakeholder landscapes. The framework synthesizes four key dimensions of project stakeholder landscapes and their various sub-factors: complexity (element and relationship complexity), uncertainty, dynamism and the institutional context. The developed framework will provide both academics and practitioners with a shared language to make sense of what types of stakeholder landscapes exist, to categorize projects based on their stakeholder environments and to start evaluating what types of implications different types of landscapes have on stakeholder management and project management in general. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. APM and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1537 / 1552
页数:16
相关论文
共 115 条
[61]  
Martin B., 2015, INTERFACE, V7, P201
[62]   Project autonomy in complex service development networks [J].
Martinsuo, Miia ;
Lehtonen, Paivi .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGING PROJECTS IN BUSINESS, 2009, 2 (02) :261-281
[63]   Managerial Complexity in Project-Based Operations: A Grounded Model and Its Implications for Practice [J].
Maylor, Harvey ;
Vidgen, Richard ;
Carver, Stephen .
PROJECT MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2008, 39 :S15-S26
[64]   The linguistic turn in project conceptualization [J].
McKenna, Allen ;
Metcalfe, Mike .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (08) :1154-1162
[65]   Complex project conceptualisation and argument mapping [J].
Metcalfe, Mike ;
Sastrowardoyo, Saras .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2013, 31 (08) :1129-1138
[66]  
Miller R., 2006, GLOBAL PROJECT MANAG, P9
[67]  
Miller R., 2001, INT J PROJ MANAG, V19, P437, DOI [10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X, DOI 10.1016/S0263-7863(01)00045-X]
[68]   Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology [J].
Missonier, Stephanie ;
Loufrani-Fedida, Sabrina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (07) :1108-1122
[69]   Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts [J].
Mitchell, RK ;
Agle, BR ;
Wood, DJ .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1997, 22 (04) :853-886
[70]   Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions [J].
Mok, Ka Yan ;
Shen, Geoffrey Qiping ;
Yang, Jing .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, 33 (02) :446-457