Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement

被引:60
作者
Fink, B. [1 ]
Urbansky, K. [1 ]
Schuster, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Orthopaed Clin, Dept Joint Replacement Rheumatoid & Gen Orthopaed, D-71706 Markgroningen, Germany
关键词
POROUS-COATED STEMS; INFECTED TOTAL HIP; 5-YEAR FOLLOW-UP; FEMORAL REVISION; BONE LOSS; TRANSFEMORAL APPROACH; ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHESIS; FIXATION; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.33280
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
We report our experience of revision total hip replacement (THR) using the Revitan curved modular titanium fluted revision stem in patients with a full spectrum of proximal femoral defects. A total of 112 patients (116 revisions) with a mean age of 73.4 years (39 to 90) were included in the study. The mean follow-up was 7.5 years (5.3 to 9.1). A total of 12 patients (12 hips) died but their data were included in the survival analysis, and four patients (4 hips) were lost to follow-up. The clinical outcome, proximal bone regeneration and subsidence were assessed for 101 hips. The mean Harris Hip Score was 88.2 (45.8 to 100) after five years and there was an increase of the mean Barnett and Nordin-Score, a measure of the proximal bone regeneration, of 20.8 (-3.1 to 52.7). Five stems had to be revised (4.3%), three (2.9%) showed subsidence, five (4.3%) a dislocation and two of 85 aseptic revisions (2.3%) a periprosthetic infection. At the latest follow-up, the survival with revision of the stem as the endpoint was 95.7% (95% confidence interval 91.9% to 99.4%) and with aseptic loosening as the endpoint, was 100%. Peri-prosthetic fractures were not observed. We report excellent results with respect to subsidence, the risk of fracture, and loosening after femoral revision using a modular curved revision stem with distal cone-in-cone fixation. A successful outcome depends on careful pre-operative planning and the use of a transfemoral approach when the anatomy is distorted or a fracture is imminent, or residual cement or a partially-secured existing stem cannot be removed. The shortest appropriate stem should, in our opinion, be used and secured with >3 cm fixation at the femoral isthmus, and distal interlocking screws should be used for additional stability when this goal cannot be realised.
引用
收藏
页码:889 / 895
页数:7
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [41] Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up
    Schuh, A
    Werber, S
    Holzwarth, U
    Zeiler, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2004, 124 (05) : 306 - 309
  • [42] Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision
    Schuh A.
    Holzwarth U.
    Zeiler G.
    [J]. Der Orthopäde, 2004, 33 (1): : 63 - 67
  • [43] Trendelenburg F, 1895, DEUT MED WOCHENSCHR, V21, P21, DOI [10.1055/s-0029-1199617, DOI 10.1055/S-0029-1199617]
  • [44] High Survival of Modular Tapered Stems for Proximal Femoral Bone Defects at 5 to 10 Years Followup
    Van Houwelingen, Andrew P.
    Duncan, Clive P.
    Masri, Bassam A.
    Greidanus, Nelson V.
    Garbuz, Donald S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (02) : 454 - 462
  • [45] WAGNER H, 1987, ORTHOPADE, V16, P295
  • [46] WAGNER H, 1989, ORTHOPADE, V18, P438
  • [47] Wagner H, 1997, MED ORTH TECH, V117, P138
  • [48] Wagner M, 1999, OPER ORTHOP TRAUMATO, V11:, P278, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02593992
  • [49] Three to seven year follow-up of a tapered modular femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Wang, Long
    Dai, Zixun
    Wen, Ting
    Li, Mingqing
    Hu, Yihe
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2013, 133 (02) : 275 - 281
  • [50] Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up of a Cementless, Modular, Tapered Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty
    Weiss, Rudiger J.
    Beckman, Mats O.
    Enocson, Anders
    Schmalholz, Anders
    Stark, Andre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (01) : 16 - 23