Exploring Workplace Testing with Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction SARS-CoV-2 Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Fuentes, Lucas [1 ]
Shah, Nigam [2 ]
Kelly, Sara [3 ]
Harnett, Glenn
Schulman, Kevin A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Clin Excellence Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Point-of-Care Testing; Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Screening; Workplace;
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210284
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Molecular tests (i.e. RT-PCR) and antigen tests are currently used to detect SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR tests are generally considered to be the gold standard for clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 due to their accuracy and reliability, but can take longer to return results than antigen tests. Objective: Examine if a point-of-care (POC) testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection would provide a flexible resource to help achieve workplace safety during this pandemic. Design: We compared the test results and time to test results between a POC RT-PCR test and a send-out PCR test for workplace screening in a workplace screening program implemented as part of the National Basketball Association (NBA) summer program in Orlando, Florida in the summer of 2020. Participants: We collected 978 samples from NBA support personnel at Disney World during the 2020 NBA Summer League subject to the NBA Universal Screening program. Main Measures: SARS-CoV-2 infection status as tested by the POC RT-PCR test and laboratory-based RT-PCR testing. Results: POC testing shorted the time to results to 110 minutes (SD 37 minutes) in the POC setting from the 754 minutes (SD 207 minutes) (p=0.00) for send-out tests. The specificity of Abstract POC RT-PCR single POC testing was 98.7% compared with send-out RT-PCR testing and was confirmed at 99.8% in a validation analysis. The sensitivity of the POC testing was 100% compared with send-out RT-PCR, although in a validation analysis, sensitivity appeared as 0% because only the 12 positive or indeterminate samples on the first analysis were retested and the majority were false-positives that were correctly ruled out. Conclusions: POC testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR technology is possible at a greatly reduced time compared with send-out PCR testing.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Update on rapid diagnostic testing for SARS-CoV-2
    Dugerdil, Adeline
    Flahault, Antoine
    ANAESTHESIA CRITICAL CARE & PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 41 (04)
  • [42] Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases
    Theel, Elitza S.
    Kirby, James E.
    Pollock, Nira R.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2024, 37 (02) : e0007223
  • [43] Current approaches in laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2
    Xu, Yuzhong
    Cheng, Minggang
    Chen, Xinchun
    Zhu, Jialou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 100 : 7 - 9
  • [44] Complications of nasal SARS-CoV-2 testing: a review
    Clark, James H.
    Pang, Sharon
    Naclerio, Robert M.
    Kashima, Matthew
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 69 (08) : 1399 - 1403
  • [45] Experience of an Orthopaedic Surgery Department Early During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Japan Including Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay Results for SARS-CoV-2
    Inoue, Gen
    Uchida, Kentaro
    Fukushima, Kensuke
    Uchiyama, Katsufumi
    Nakazawa, Toshiyuki
    Aikawa, Jun
    Matsuura, Terumasa
    Miyagi, Masayuki
    Takahira, Naonobu
    Takaso, Masashi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [46] Lung Ultrasound Characteristics in Neonates With Positive Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for SARS-CoV-2 on a Tertiary Level Referral Hospital in Mexico City
    Ibarra-Rios, Daniel
    Enriquez-Estrada, Andrea Constanza
    Serpa-Maldonado, Eunice Valeria
    Miranda-Vega, Ana Luisa
    Villanueva-Garcia, Dina
    Vazquez-Solano, Edna Patricia
    Marquez-Gonzalez, Horacio
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [47] SARS-CoV-2 infection testing at delivery: a clinical and epidemiological priority
    Ferrazzi, Enrico
    Beretta, Paolo
    Bianchi, Stefano
    Cetin, Irene
    Guarnerio, Paolo
    Locatelli, Anna
    Marconi, Anna Maria
    Meroni, Mario Giuseppe
    Pavone, Giulia
    Pintucci, Armando
    Prefumo, Federico
    Savasi, Valeria
    Spinillo, Arsenio
    Tassis, Beatrice
    Vergani, Patrizia
    Vignali, Michele
    Parazzini, Fabio
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (12) : 2417 - 2419
  • [48] Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDxTM vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Cattelan, Anna Maria
    Sasset, Lolita
    Zabeo, Federico
    Ferrari, Anna
    Rossi, Lucia
    Mazzitelli, Maria
    Cocchio, Silvia
    Baldo, Vincenzo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [49] Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen detection tests to real time polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Jonghoo
    Song, Jae-Uk
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [50] Is point-of-care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of a point-of-care polymerase chain reaction test for SARS-CoV-2
    Micocci, Massimo
    Gordon, Adam L.
    Seo, Mikyung Kelly
    Allen, A. Joy
    Davies, Kerrie
    Lasserson, Dan
    Thompson, Carl
    Spilsbury, Karen
    Akrill, Cyd
    Heath, Ros
    Astle, Anita
    Sharpe, Claire
    Perera, Rafael
    Hayward, Gail
    Buckle, Peter
    AGE AND AGEING, 2021, 50 (05) : 1464 - 1472