Exploring Workplace Testing with Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction SARS-CoV-2 Testing

被引:2
|
作者
Fuentes, Lucas [1 ]
Shah, Nigam [2 ]
Kelly, Sara [3 ]
Harnett, Glenn
Schulman, Kevin A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Biomed Informat, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Clin Excellence Res Ctr, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
COVID-19; Point-of-Care Testing; Polymerase Chain Reaction; SARS-CoV-2; Screening; Workplace;
D O I
10.3122/jabfm.2022.01.210284
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Molecular tests (i.e. RT-PCR) and antigen tests are currently used to detect SARS-CoV-2. RT-PCR tests are generally considered to be the gold standard for clinical diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 due to their accuracy and reliability, but can take longer to return results than antigen tests. Objective: Examine if a point-of-care (POC) testing for SARS-CoV-2 infection would provide a flexible resource to help achieve workplace safety during this pandemic. Design: We compared the test results and time to test results between a POC RT-PCR test and a send-out PCR test for workplace screening in a workplace screening program implemented as part of the National Basketball Association (NBA) summer program in Orlando, Florida in the summer of 2020. Participants: We collected 978 samples from NBA support personnel at Disney World during the 2020 NBA Summer League subject to the NBA Universal Screening program. Main Measures: SARS-CoV-2 infection status as tested by the POC RT-PCR test and laboratory-based RT-PCR testing. Results: POC testing shorted the time to results to 110 minutes (SD 37 minutes) in the POC setting from the 754 minutes (SD 207 minutes) (p=0.00) for send-out tests. The specificity of Abstract POC RT-PCR single POC testing was 98.7% compared with send-out RT-PCR testing and was confirmed at 99.8% in a validation analysis. The sensitivity of the POC testing was 100% compared with send-out RT-PCR, although in a validation analysis, sensitivity appeared as 0% because only the 12 positive or indeterminate samples on the first analysis were retested and the majority were false-positives that were correctly ruled out. Conclusions: POC testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR technology is possible at a greatly reduced time compared with send-out PCR testing.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SARS-CoV-2 direct real-time polymerase chain reaction testing in laboratories with shortage challenges
    Alaifan, Taghreed
    Altamimi, Asmaa
    Obeid, Dalia
    Alshehri, Turki
    Almatrrouk, Shaihana
    Albarrag, Ahmed
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2021, 16 (02) : 133 - 140
  • [2] Performance and cost-effectiveness of a pooled testing strategy for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in Uganda
    Bogere, Naghib
    Bongomin, Felix
    Katende, Andrew
    Ssebambulidde, Kenneth
    Ssengooba, Willy
    Ssenfuka, Henry
    Kigozi, Edgar
    Biraro, Samuel
    Kateete, David P.
    Andia-Biraro, Irene
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 113 : 355 - 358
  • [3] Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study
    Paradiso, Angelo Virgilio
    De Summa, Simona
    Loconsole, Daniela
    Procacci, Vito
    Sallustio, Anna
    Centrone, Francesca
    Silvestris, Nicola
    Cafagna, Vito
    De Palma, Giuseppe
    Tufaro, Antonio
    Garrisi, Vito Michele
    Chironna, Maria
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2020, 22 (10)
  • [4] A reduction of the number of assays and turnaround time by optimizing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) pooled testing for SARS-CoV-2
    Perivolaropoulos, Christos
    Vlacha, Vasiliki
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 93 (07) : 4508 - 4515
  • [5] Detection of SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction in different clinical specimens: A critical review
    Muhammad, Anees
    Ameer, Hajira
    Haider, Syed Adnan
    Ali, Ihsan
    ALLERGOLOGIA ET IMMUNOPATHOLOGIA, 2021, 49 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [6] Utility of preoperative polymerase chain reaction testing during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: The challenge of evolving incidence
    de la Matta, M.
    Delgado-Sanchez, J. M.
    Gutierrez, G. M.
    Lopez Romero, J. L.
    Martinez Gomez, M. del Mar
    Dominguez Blanco, A.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 2021, 68 (06): : 346 - 352
  • [7] Evaluation of seven commercial SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection kits based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in China
    Wang, Bingqi
    Hu, Min
    Ren, Yaping
    Xu, Xinyi
    Wang, Zeyou
    Lyu, Xing
    Wu, Weimin
    Li, Ziyang
    Gong, Xing
    Xiang, Zhongyuan
    Tang, Lingli
    Peng, Yizhi
    Wang, Min
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 58 (09) : E149 - E153
  • [8] Evaluation of Rapid Antigen Test Results and Real-time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Laboratory Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2
    Tanriverdi Cayci, Yeliz
    Seyfi, Zeliha
    Hacieminoglu Ulker, Kubra
    Gur Vural, Demet
    Bilgin, Kemal
    Akdemir, Hizir Ufuk
    Akyuz Ozkan, Esra
    Birinci, Asuman
    MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION MICROBES AND ANTIMICROBIALS, 2023, 12
  • [9] Diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 with Antigen Testing, Transcription-Mediated Amplification and Real-Time PCR
    Dierks, Sascha
    Bader, Oliver
    Schwanbeck, Julian
    Gross, Uwe
    Weig, Michael S.
    Mese, Kemal
    Lugert, Raimond
    Bohne, Wolfgang
    Hahn, Andreas
    Feltgen, Nicolas
    Torkieh, Setare
    Denker, Fenja R.
    Lauermann, Peer
    Storch, Marcus W.
    Frickmann, Hagen
    Zautner, Andreas Erich
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (11)
  • [10] Time variation in the probability of failing to detect a case of polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 as estimated from a viral dynamics model
    Ejima, Keisuke
    Kim, Kwang Su
    Iwanami, Shoya
    Fujita, Yasuhisa
    Li, Ming
    Zoh, Roger S.
    Aihara, Kazuyuki
    Miyazaki, Taiga
    Wakita, Takaji
    Iwami, Shingo
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2021, 18 (177)