Accelerating Improvement of Livestock with Genomic Selection

被引:231
作者
Meuwissen, Theo [1 ]
Hayes, Ben [2 ]
Goddard, Mike [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim & Aquaculture Sci, N-1430 As, Norway
[2] Dept Primary Ind, Biosci Res Div, Bundoora, Vic 3083, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Land & Environm, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, VOL 1 | 2013年 / 1卷
关键词
marker-assisted selection; genetic improvement; complex traits; use of genome sequence data; GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION; DAIRY-CATTLE; BREEDING VALUES; RELATIONSHIP MATRIX; COMPLEX TRAITS; FULL PEDIGREE; MILK-YIELD; PREDICTION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-animal-031412-103705
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Three recent breakthroughs have resulted in the current widespread use of DNA information: the genomic selection (GS) methodology, which is a form of marker-assisted selection on a genome-wide scale, and the discovery of large numbers of single-nucleotide markers and cost effective methods to genotype them. GS estimates the effect of thousands of DNA markers simultaneously. Nonlinear estimation methods yield higher accuracy, especially for traits with major genes. The marker effects are estimated in a genotyped and phenotyped training population and are used for the estimation of breeding values of selection candidates by combining their genotypes with the estimated marker effects. The benefits of GS are greatest when selection is for traits that are not themselves recorded on the selection candidates before they can be selected. In the future, genome sequence data may replace SNP genotypes as markers. This could increase GS accuracy because the causative mutations should be included in the data.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 237
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dissection of the impact of prioritized QTL-linked and -unlinked SNP markers on the accuracy of genomic selection1
    Ling, Ashley S.
    Hay, El Hamidi
    Aggrey, Samuel E.
    Rekaya, Romdhane
    [J]. BMC GENOMIC DATA, 2021, 22 (01):
  • [42] FMixFN: A Fast Big Data-Oriented Genomic Selection Model Based on an Iterative Conditional Expectation algorithm
    Xu, Wenwu
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Liao, Mingfu
    Xiao, Shijun
    Zheng, Min
    Yao, Tianxiong
    Chen, Zuoquan
    Huang, Lusheng
    Zhang, Zhiyan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2021, 12
  • [43] A simulation study comparing advanced marker-assisted selection with genomic selection in tree breeding programs
    Degen, Bernd
    Mueller, Niels A.
    [J]. G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [44] Review: optimizing genomic selection for crossbred performance by model improvement and data collection
    Duenk, Pascal
    Bijma, Piter
    Wientjes, Yvonne C. J.
    Calus, Mario P. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2021, 99 (08)
  • [45] Genomic selection for improvement of growth traits in triangle sail mussel (Hyriopsis cumingii)
    Wang, Zhiyan
    Hu, Honghui
    Sun, Tianyang
    Li, Xing
    Lv, Gaolun
    Bai, Zhiyi
    Li, Jiale
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2022, 561
  • [46] Applications of Omics Technology for Livestock Selection and Improvement
    Chakraborty, Dibyendu
    Sharma, Neelesh
    Kour, Savleen
    Sodhi, Simrinder Singh
    Gupta, Mukesh Kumar
    Lee, Sung Jin
    Son, Young Ok
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [47] Ridge Regression and Other Kernels for Genomic Selection with R Package rrBLUP
    Endelman, Jeffrey B.
    [J]. PLANT GENOME, 2011, 4 (03): : 250 - 255
  • [48] Invited review: Quantitative trait nucleotide determination in the era of genomic selection
    Weller, J. I.
    Ron, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2011, 94 (03) : 1082 - 1090
  • [49] Diversifying maize genomic selection models
    Rice, Brian R.
    Lipka, Alexander E.
    [J]. MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2021, 41 (06)
  • [50] Extension of the bayesian alphabet for genomic selection
    Habier, David
    Fernando, Rohan L.
    Kizilkaya, Kadir
    Garrick, Dorian J.
    [J]. BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 12