Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A pilot study of outcomes in women receiving midwifery care

被引:11
作者
Avery, MD [1 ]
Carr, CA [1 ]
Burkhardt, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Nursing, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
cesarean section; vaginal birth after cesarean section;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.12.014
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
A recent trend discouraging or not offering women a choice to labor after a cesarean birth has resulted in higher cesarean birth rates and lower rates of vaginal birth after cesarean birth (VBAC). The few studies describing midwifery practice have demonstrated favorable outcomes; however, the studies are too small to thoroughly evaluate critical outcomes. In this retrospective descriptive study, clinical outcome data were obtained from eight midwifery practices. The aims were to collect, aggregate, and analyze data from multiple midwifery practices and then describe outcomes. Usable data representing 649 trials of labor were submitted. Overall, 72% (range 64%-100%) of women gave birth vaginally. Mean infant birth weight was 3,501 (SD = 534) g, and the mean Apgar scores were 7.99 (SD = 1.4; median 8) at 1 minute and 8.84 (SD = 0.8; median 9) at 5 minutes. Only 5.3% (n = 14) of infants were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. This small retrospective study demonstrates similar outcomes to those reported in the current literature. A larger prospective study to carefully describe midwifery care outcomes using a common data collection method is needed to provide evidence for determining the continuation of VBAC as part of midwifery care. (C) 2004 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Women's views of birth after cesarean section
    Sys, Dorota
    Kajdy, Anna
    Baranowska, Barbara
    Tataj-Puzyna, Urszula
    Gotlib, Joanna
    Baczek, Grazyna
    Rabijewski, Michal
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 47 (12) : 4270 - 4279
  • [22] NORTH JORDAN EXPERIENCE WITH VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    ABUHEIJA, AT
    ZAYED, FA
    BUSTAMI, KB
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1992, 39 (03) : 234 - 234
  • [23] Outcome of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Spontaneous Versus Induced Labor in Women with One Previous Cesarean Section
    Kiwan, Rana
    Al Qahtani, Nourah
    ANNALS OF AFRICAN MEDICINE, 2018, 17 (03) : 145 - 150
  • [24] Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Experience from a regional hospital
    Chen, Yi Ting
    Hsieh, Yun-Chiao
    Shen, Hung
    Cheng, Chin-Ho
    Lee, Kuang-Han
    Torng, Pao-Ling
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (03): : 422 - 426
  • [25] Sociodemographic factors and pregnancy events associated with women who declined vaginal birth after cesarean section
    Pang, Man Wah
    Law, Lai Wah
    Leung, Tak Yeung
    Lai, Pui Yee
    La, Tze Kin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2009, 143 (01) : 24 - 28
  • [26] Trial of labor and vaginal birth after cesarean section in patients with uterine Mullerian anomalies: a population based study
    Erez, Offer
    Dukler, Doron
    Novack, Lena
    Rozen, Amit
    Zolotnik, Leonid
    Bashiri, Asher
    Koifman, Arie
    Mazor, Moshe
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 196 (06) : 537 - 538
  • [27] Risks involved in cesarean section and vaginal birth
    Hillemanns, P
    Anthuber, C
    Hepp, H
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2000, 33 (12): : 872 - 881
  • [28] Opinions of Obstetricians and Midwives for Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section: A Qualitative Study in Türkiye
    Bidik, Nazli Unlu
    Turfan, Esin Ceber
    CYPRUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 9 (03): : 205 - 211
  • [29] Vaginal birth after cesarean section: A quantitative study exploring women's understanding and experience regarding VBAC rates in Greece
    Moysiadou, Stefania
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY, 2023, 7
  • [30] Persistent post-partum pain after vaginal birth and cesarean section
    Fabris, Lada Kalagac
    PERIODICUM BIOLOGORUM, 2011, 113 (02) : 239 - 241