Towards a more holistic sustainability assessment framework for agro-bioenergy systems - A review

被引:49
作者
Arodudu, Oludunsin [1 ,2 ]
Helming, Katharina [1 ,4 ]
Wiggering, Hubert [1 ,2 ]
Voinov, Alexey [3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
[2] Univ Potsdam, Inst Earth & Environm Sci, Karl Liebknecht Str 24-25, D-14476 Golm, Germany
[3] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat & Earth Observat, ITC, Hengelosestr 99, Enschede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Sustainable Dev HNEE, Fac Landscape Management & Nat Conservat, Schiclder Str 5, D-16225 Eberswalde, Germany
基金
欧盟第七框架计划;
关键词
LCA; Life cycle thinking; Life cycle sustainability assessment; Sustainability assessment; Agronomic factors; Agro-ecological; NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LAND-USE CHANGE; GREY WATER FOOTPRINT; ENERGY RETURN; HUMAN APPROPRIATION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INVESTMENT EROI; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; PRODUCTION POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a sustainability assessment tool for agro-bioenergy system usually has an industrial agriculture bias. Furthermore, LCA generally has often been criticized for being a decision maker tool which may not consider decision takers perceptions. They are lacking in spatial and temporal depth, and unable to assess sufficiently some environmental impact categories such as biodiversity, land use etc. and most economic and social impact categories, e.g. food security, water security, energy security. This study explored tools, methodologies and frameworks that can be deployed individually, as well as in combination with each other for bridging these methodological gaps in application to agro-bioenergy systems. Integrating agronomic options, e.g. alternative farm power, tillage, seed sowing options, fertilizer, pesticide, irrigation into the boundaries of LCAs for agro-bioenergy systems will not only provide an alternative agro-ecological perspective to previous LCAs, but will also lead to the-derivation of indicators for assessment of some social and economic impact categories. Deploying life cycle thinking approaches such as energy return on energy invested-EROEI, human appropriation of net primary production-HANPP,. net greenhouse gas or carbon balance-NCB, water footprint individually and in combination with each other will also lead to further derivation of indicators suitable for assessing relevant environmental, social and economic impact categories. Also, applying spatio-temporal simulation models has a potential for improving the spatial and temporal depths of LCA analysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 75
页数:15
相关论文
共 165 条
  • [11] Assessing bioenergy potential in rural areas - A NEG-EROEI approach
    Arodudu, Oludunsin
    Voinov, Alexey
    van Duren, Iris
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2013, 58 : 350 - 364
  • [12] Energy use indicators in energy and life cycle assessments of biofuels: review and recommendations
    Arvidsson, Rickard
    Fransson, Kristin
    Froling, Morgan
    Svanstrom, Magdalena
    Molander, Sverker
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2012, 31 : 54 - 61
  • [13] Assessing the Importance of Spatial Variability versus Model Choices in Life Cycle Impact Assessment: The Case of Freshwater Eutrophication in Europe
    Azevedo, Ligia B.
    Henderson, Andrew D.
    van Zelm, Rosalie
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Huijbregts, Mark A. J.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (23) : 13565 - 13570
  • [14] Global patterns and trends of wood harvest and use between 1990 and 2010
    Bais, Anna Liza S.
    Lauk, Christian
    Kastner, Thomas
    Erb, Karlheinz
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 119 : 326 - 337
  • [15] Global wheat production potentials and management flexibility under the representative concentration pathways
    Balkovic, Juraj
    van der Velde, Marijn
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Xiong, Wei
    Folberth, Christian
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Smirnov, Alexey
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    Obersteiner, Michael
    [J]. GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE, 2014, 122 : 107 - 121
  • [16] BARE JC, 2003, J IND ECOLOGY, V0006
  • [17] The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies
    Berndes, G
    Hoogwijk, M
    van den Broek, R
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2003, 25 (01) : 1 - 28
  • [18] Bizikova L., 2013, WATER ENERGY FOOD SE
  • [19] Transitions to agroecological farming systems in the Mississippi River Basin: toward an integrated socioecological analysis
    Blesh, Jennifer
    Wolf, Steven A.
    [J]. AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2014, 31 (04) : 621 - 635
  • [20] Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance
    Bondeau, Alberte
    Smith, Pascalle C.
    Zaehle, Soenke
    Schaphoff, Sibyll
    Lucht, Wolfgang
    Cramer, Wolfgang
    Gerten, Dieter
    Lotze-Campen, Hermann
    Mueller, Christoph
    Reichstein, Markus
    Smith, Benjamin
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2007, 13 (03) : 679 - 706