Relationship between cotton yield and soil electrical conductivity, topography, and Landsat imagery

被引:51
作者
Guo, Wenxuan [1 ]
Maas, Stephan J. [2 ]
Bronson, Kevin F. [3 ]
机构
[1] S Plains Precis Ag, Plainview, TX 79072 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Lubbock, TX 79415 USA
[3] ARS, Arid Land Agr Res Ctr, USDA, Maricopa, AZ 85138 USA
关键词
Apparent electrical conductivity; Remote sensing; Bare soil brightness; Topography; Yield monitor; SOUTHERN HIGH-PLAINS; LANDSCAPE POSITION; SPATIAL VARIABILITY; LINT YIELD; GRAIN-YIELD; MANAGEMENT; CLASSIFICATION; PRODUCTIVITY; AGRICULTURE; EROSION;
D O I
10.1007/s11119-012-9277-2
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Understanding spatial and temporal variability in crop yield is a prerequisite to implementing site-specific management of crop inputs. Apparent soil electrical conductivity (ECa), soil brightness, and topography are easily obtained data that can explain yield variability. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the spatial and temporal variability in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and determine the relationship between yield and soil ECa, topography, and bare soil brightness at a field level in multiple growing seasons. A 50-ha field grown with cotton from 2000 to 2003 and 2005 on the Southern High Plains of Texas was selected for this study. Yield was negatively correlated with bare soil brightness (-0.47 < r < -0.33 for red band) and positively correlated with ECa (0.08 < r < 0.29 for 30-cm ECa and 0.28 < r < 0.44 for 90-cm ECa). Yield had stronger correlation with relative elevation and slope than with profile curvature and planar curvature. Combined, ECa, topographic attributes, and bare soil brightness explained up to 70.1 % of cotton yield variability. Bare soil brightness and ECa were strongly related to soil texture. Brighter soils with low ECa values had lower clay content. Yield and soil properties had stronger correlation in dry growing seasons than in wet growing seasons. Cotton yield variability pattern was relatively stable across different growing seasons. Soil texture was one of the greatest factors influencing cotton yield variability. Results of this study provide a basis for site-specific management of yield goals and variable rate application of water, fertilizers, seeds, and other inputs.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 692
页数:15
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Integrated irrigated crop-livestock systems in dry climates [J].
Allen, V. G. ;
Baker, M. T. ;
Segarra, E. ;
Brown, C. P. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2007, 99 (02) :346-360
[2]  
Barnes EM, 2000, APPL ENG AGRIC, V16, P731
[3]  
BOWERS S. A., 1965, SOIL SCI, V100, P130, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196508000-00009
[4]   Apparent electrical conductivity, soil properties and spatial covariance in the U.S. Southern High Plains [J].
Bronson K.F. ;
Booker J.D. ;
Officer S.J. ;
Lascano R.J. ;
Maas S.J. ;
Searcy S.W. ;
Booker J. .
Precision Agriculture, 2005, 6 (3) :297-311
[5]   Site-specific irrigation and nitrogen management for cotton production in the Southern High Plains [J].
Bronson, KF ;
Booker, JD ;
Bordovsky, JP ;
Keeling, JW ;
Wheeler, TA ;
Boman, RK ;
Parajulee, MN ;
Segarra, E ;
Nichols, RL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (01) :212-219
[6]   Influence of landscape position, soil series, and phosphorus fertilizer on cotton lint yield [J].
Bronson, KF ;
Keeling, JW ;
Booker, JD ;
Chua, TT ;
Wheeler, TA ;
Boman, RK ;
Lascano, RJ .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (04) :949-957
[7]   Factors influencing spatial variability of soil apparent electrical conductivity [J].
Clay, DE ;
Chang, J ;
Malo, DD ;
Carlson, CG ;
Reese, C ;
Clay, SA ;
Ellsbury, M ;
Berg, B .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2001, 32 (19-20) :2993-3008
[8]   Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture [J].
Corwin, DL ;
Lesch, SM .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 46 (1-3) :11-43
[9]  
Corwin DL, 2003, AGRON J, V95, P352, DOI 10.2134/agronj2003.0455
[10]  
Dobermann A, 2003, AGRON J, V95, P924, DOI 10.2134/agronj2003.0924