4-E analysis of heavy oil-based IGCC

被引:6
作者
Markadeh, Rasoul Shahsavan [1 ]
Arabkhalaj, Arash [1 ]
Ghassemi, Hojat [1 ]
Ahmadi, Pouria [2 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Mech Engn, POB 16765-163, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Illinois, Inst Sustainabil Energy & Environm, Champaign, IL USA
关键词
IGCC; heavy fuel oil; energy; exergy; economic; environment; GASIFICATION COMBINED-CYCLE; POWER-PLANT; ENERGY; GENERATION; OPERATION; CAPTURE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/15567036.2019.1602198
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This article aims to evaluate different heavy oil derivatives as feedstock for integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) through energy, exergy, economic, and environmental analysis. For this purpose, the simulation of a 450 MW IGCC in Aspen Plus is performed, and optimum values of operational parameters are obtained to maximize electrical efficiency. A heavy fuel oil (Mazut), Vacuum residue (VR), and vacuum residue water slurry (VR+W) are considered as input feedstock. The thermodynamics results show that VR case with first and second law electrical efficiencies of 34.6 and 34.4% has the best electrical performance. However, by considering recoverable heat, the total efficiencies of VR+W is the maximum with 45.7 and 45.5% for energy and exergy, respectively. The economic analysis demonstrates that the total capital costs are in the same order, but because of differences in annual fuel cost for a payback period of 5 years, the electricity price should be 0.143, 0.127, and 0.125 ($/kWh) for Mazut, VR+W, and VR cases, respectively. Finally, concerning performance, economic, and environmental aspects, it seems the proposed IGCC plant with heavy oil feedstock has the ability to compete in the power generation market.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 863
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Energy and exergy analysis of a steam power plant in Jordan [J].
Aijundi, Isam H. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 29 (2-3) :324-328
[2]  
Allevi C., 2000, 16 WORLD PETR C CALG
[3]   Exergy analysis of a 420 MW combined cycle power plant [J].
Ameri, M. ;
Ahmadi, P. ;
Khanmohammadi, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2008, 32 (02) :175-183
[4]  
[Anonymous], TECHNOLOGY EVOLUTION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1968, PLANT DESIGN EC CHEM
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INTEGRATED GASIFICAT
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2017, NATL IRANIAN OIL REF
[8]   Thermodynamic evaluation of integrated gasification combined cycle: Comparison between high-ash and low-ash coals [J].
Arabkhalaj, Arash ;
Ghassemi, Hojat ;
Markadeh, Rasoul Shahsavan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2016, 40 (12) :1638-1651
[9]   Numerical and experimental study of heavy oil gasification in an entrained-flow reactor and the impact of the burner concept [J].
Bader, A. ;
Hartwich, M. ;
Richter, A. ;
Meyer, B. .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 169 :58-70
[10]  
Bejan A., 1995, Thermal Design and Optimization