Automated versus manual blood pressure measurement: A randomized crossover trial

被引:20
作者
Heinemann, Megan [2 ]
Sellick, Ken [1 ]
Rickard, Claire [3 ,4 ]
Reynolds, Pam [5 ]
McGrail, Matthew [6 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Churchill, Vic 3842, Australia
[2] Latrobe Reg Hosp, Traralgon, Vic, Australia
[3] Griffith Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[4] Griffith Univ, Res Ctr Clin & Community Practice Innovat, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[5] RMIT Univ, Sch Hlth Sci Nursing & Midwifery, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Dept Rural & Indigenous Hlth, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
automated blood pressure machines; blood pressure; measurement; nursing practice; vital signs;
D O I
10.1111/j.1440-172X.2008.00696.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the accuracy and reliability of the Dinamap 8100 automated blood pressure machine against three internationally recognized criteria. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were taken concurrently by two nurses using the automated machine and a manual sphygmomanometer. Results demonstrated agreement between automated and manual readings on one set of criteria for both systolic and diastolic pressures, and support for systolic readings only on one other criterion. Comparison of mean differences between automated and manual measures showed the automated machine consistently under-read both systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The conclusion from this study was that the Dinamap 8100 machine can be used with some degree of confidence to assess systolic blood pressures in a general population of adult hospital inpatients, but with caution when taking diastolic readings.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 302
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Dinamap 8100 and Omron M1 blood pressure monitors for use in children [J].
Barker, ME ;
Shiell, AW ;
Law, CM .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 14 (02) :179-186
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Carney S L, 1999, J Qual Clin Pract, V19, P95, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x
[4]  
Coe T, 2002, AMBUL SURG, V10, P9, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0966-6532(01)00112-3
[5]  
CRISP J, 2001, POTTER PERRYS FUNDAM
[6]  
Fuon CW, 2000, SINGAPORE NURSING J, V27, P28
[7]   Comparison of Dinamap 8100 with sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurement in a prepubertal diabetes cohort [J].
Jin, RZ ;
Donaghue, KC ;
Fairchild, JM ;
Chan, A ;
Silink, M .
JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH, 2001, 37 (06) :545-549
[8]   Comparison of acceptability of and preferences for different methods of measuring blood pressure in primary care [J].
Little, P ;
Barnett, J ;
Barnsley, L ;
Marjoram, J ;
Fitzgerald-Barron, A ;
Mant, D .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7358) :258-259
[9]   Blood pressure measuring devices: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension [J].
O'Brien, E ;
Waeber, B ;
Parati, G ;
Staessen, J ;
Myers, MG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7285) :531-536
[10]   THE BRITISH-HYPERTENSION-SOCIETY PROTOCOL FOR THE EVALUATION OF AUTOMATED AND SEMIAUTOMATED BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASURING DEVICES WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMBULATORY SYSTEMS [J].
OBRIEN, E ;
PETRIE, J ;
LITTLER, W ;
DESWIET, M ;
PADFIELD, PL ;
OMALLEY, K ;
JAMIESON, M ;
ALTMAN, D ;
BLAND, M ;
ATKINS, N .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1990, 8 (07) :607-619