Bioequivalence study of two capsule formulations of omeprazole in healthy volunteers

被引:2
作者
Allegrini, Alessandro [1 ]
Nuzzo, Loredana [1 ]
Scaringi, Andrea Tavella [1 ]
Felaco, Stefano [1 ]
Pavone, Daniele [1 ]
Toniato, Elena [1 ]
Mezzetti, Andrea [1 ]
Martinotti, Stefano [1 ]
Lenotti, Giuseppina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ G dAnnunzio, Ctr Excellence Aging, Clin Res Ctr, Chieti, Italy
[2] Errekappa Euroterapici SpA, Milan, Italy
来源
ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH | 2008年 / 58卷 / 08期
关键词
CAS; 73590-58-6; omeprazole; bioequivalence; pharmacokinetics; proton pump inhibitors;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
The study was conducted in order to assess the bioequivalence of two capsule formulations (test and reference) containing 20 mg of omeprazole (5-methoxy2-[[4-methoxy-3,5-dimethyl-2-pyridinyl) methyl]sulfinyl]-1H-benzimidazole, CAS 73590-58-6). Fifty healthy male and female volunteers were treated in a single-centre, randomised, repeated-dose (once daily for six consecutive days), open-label, two-way crossover study, with a washout period of at least 9 days between treatments. Plasma samples were collected up to 12 h post-dosing for the determination of omeprazole by HPLC with photodiode array detector (DAD). The evaluation of bioequivalence was based on the following pharmacokinetic parameters that were calculated by standard non-compartmental methods: area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(t)) and that extrapolated to infinity (AUC) and the maximum observed concentration (C-max). The 90% confidence interval around the ratios (test/reference) (obtained by analysis of variance, ANOVA) were 0.92-1.04 for C-max, 0.88-1.05 for AUC(t), and 0.88-1.05 for AUC, i.e., within the predefined acceptable range for the conclusion of bioequivalence. The study indicated that the test and reference formulations containing 20 mg of omeprazole are bioequivalent in terms of both the rate and extent of bioavailability.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 388
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Comparative bioavailability study of two oral omeprazole formulations after single and repeated administrations in healthy volunteers [J].
Duvauchelle, T ;
Millerioux, L ;
Gualano, V ;
Evene, E ;
Alcaide, A .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 1998, 16 (02) :141-149
[2]  
*EUR AG EV MED PRO, 2001, CPMPEWPQWP1401 EUR A
[3]   Bioequivalence evaluation of two omeprazole enteric-coated formulations in humans [J].
Farinha, A ;
Bica, A ;
Pais, JP ;
Toscano, MC ;
Tavares, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 1999, 7 (04) :311-315
[4]   Review article: acid-related disease - what are the unmet clinical needs? [J].
Katz, P. O. ;
Scheiman, J. M. ;
Barkun, A. N. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 23 :9-22
[5]  
Richards J P, 1999, Gastroenterol Hepatol, V22, P171
[6]   Review article: the clinical pharmacology of proton pump inhibitors [J].
Sachs, G ;
Shin, JM ;
Howden, CW .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2006, 23 :2-8
[7]  
The European Agency for the Evaluation of Me-dicinal Products, 2002, CPMPICH13595
[8]  
US FDA, 2001, GUID IND BIOAN METH
[9]   Bioavailability and bioequivalence of two enteric-coated formulations of omeprazole in fasting and fed conditions [J].
Vaz-da-Silva, M ;
Loureiro, AI ;
Nunes, T ;
Maia, J ;
Tavares, S ;
Falcao, A ;
Silveira, P ;
Almeida, L ;
Soares-da-Silva, P .
CLINICAL DRUG INVESTIGATION, 2005, 25 (06) :391-399
[10]  
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, 2000, 52 WMA GEN ASS ED SC