Electrophysiological Estimates of the Electrode-Neuron Interface Differ Between Younger and Older Listeners With Cochlear Implants

被引:21
作者
Jahn, Kelly N. [1 ,2 ]
Arenberg, Julie G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Eaton Peabody Labs, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Auditory nerve; Cochlear implant; Electrically evoked compound action potential; Interphase gap; Pediatric; SPIRAL GANGLION NEURONS; INTRACOCHLEAR ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; AMPLITUDE-GROWTH FUNCTIONS; AUDITORY-NERVE; WORD RECOGNITION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; INTERPHASE GAP; HEARING-LOSS; SURVIVAL; CELLS;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000827
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to quantify differences in evoked potential correlates of spiral ganglion neuron (SGN) density between younger and older individuals with cochlear implants (CIs) using the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). In human temporal bone studies and in animal models, SGN density is the lowest in older subjects and in those who experienced long durations of deafness during life. SGN density also varies as a function of age at implantation and hearing loss etiology. Taken together, it is likely that younger listeners who were deafened and implanted during childhood have denser populations of SGNs than older individuals who were deafened and implanted later in life. In animals, ECAP amplitudes, amplitude growth function (AGF) slopes, and their sensitivity to stimulus interphase gap (IPG) are predictive of SGN density. The authors hypothesized that younger listeners who were deafened and implanted as children would demonstrate larger ECAP amplitudes, steeper AGF slopes, and greater IPG sensitivity than older, adult-deafened and implanted listeners. Design: Data were obtained from 22 implanted ears (18 individuals). Thirteen ears (9 individuals) were deafened and implanted as children (child-implanted group), and nine ears (9 individuals) were deafened and implanted as adults (adult-implanted group). The groups differed significantly on a number of demographic variables that are implicitly related to SGN density: (1) chronological age; (2) age at implantation; and (3) duration of preimplantation hearing loss. ECAP amplitudes, AGF linear slopes, and thresholds were assessed on a subset of electrodes in each ear in response to two IPGs (7 and 30 mu sec). Speech recognition was assessed using a medial vowel identification task. Results: Compared with the adult-implanted listeners, individuals in the child-implanted group demonstrated larger changes in ECAP amplitude when the IPG of the stimulus was increased from 7 to 30 mu sec (i.e., greater IPG sensitivity). On average, child-implanted participants also had larger ECAP amplitudes and steeper AGF linear slopes than the adult-implanted participants, irrespective of IPG. IPG sensitivity for AGF linear slope and ECAP threshold did not differ between age groups. Vowel recognition performance was not correlated with any of the ECAP measures assessed in this study. Conclusions: The results of this study support the theory that young CI listeners who were deafened and implanted during childhood may have denser neural populations than older listeners who were deafened and implanted as adults. Potential between-group differences in SGN integrity emphasize a need to investigate optimized CI programming parameters for younger and older listeners.
引用
收藏
页码:948 / 960
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential [J].
Abbas, PJ ;
Brown, CJ ;
Shallop, JK ;
Firszt, JB ;
Hughes, ML ;
Hong, SH ;
Staller, SJ .
EAR AND HEARING, 1999, 20 (01) :45-59
[2]   A Dynamically Focusing Cochlear Implant Strategy Can Improve Vowel Identification in Noise [J].
Arenberg, Julie G. ;
Parkinson, Wendy S. ;
Litvak, Leonid ;
Chen, Chen ;
Kreft, Heather A. ;
Oxenham, Andrew J. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2018, 39 (06) :1136-1145
[3]  
Barton K, 2018, MUMIN MULTIMODEL INF
[4]   Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: Comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations [J].
Berenstein, Carlo K. ;
Mens, Lucas H. M. ;
Mulder, Jef J. S. ;
Vanpoucke, Filiep J. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (02) :250-260
[5]   An Examination of Sources of Variability Across the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant Test in Cochlear Implant Listeners [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg ;
Spindler, Eugene ;
Bierer, Steven M. ;
Wright, Richard .
TRENDS IN HEARING, 2016, 20
[6]   Probing the Electrode-Neuron Interface With Focused Cochlear Implant Stimulation [J].
Bierer, Julie Arenberg .
TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION, 2010, 14 (02) :84-95
[7]   Effects of Long-Term Use of a Cochlear Implant on the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential [J].
Brown, Carolyn J. ;
Abbas, Paul J. ;
Etler, Christine P. ;
O'Brien, Sara ;
Oleson, Jacob J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 21 (01) :5-15
[8]   Evaluating Intracochlear Trauma after Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion through Middle Fossa Approach in Temporal Bones [J].
Cisneros Lesser, Juan Carlos ;
de Brito, Rubens ;
Queiroz Martins, Graziela de Souza ;
Mello Santiago Gebrim, Eloisa Maria ;
Bento, Ricardo Ferreira .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 158 (02) :350-357
[9]   A silastic positioner for a modiolus-hugging position of intracochlear electrodes: Electrophysiologic effects [J].
Cords, SM ;
Reuter, G ;
Issing, PR ;
Sommer, A ;
Kuzma, J ;
Lenarz, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2000, 21 (02) :212-217
[10]   Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements uing the neural response telemetry of the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system [J].
Dees, DC ;
Dillier, N ;
Lai, WK ;
von Wallenberg, E ;
van Dijk, B ;
Akdas, F ;
Aksit, M ;
Batman, C ;
Beynon, A ;
Burdo, S ;
Chanal, JM ;
Collet, L ;
Conway, M ;
Coudert, C ;
Craddock, L ;
Cullington, H ;
Deggouj, N ;
Fraysse, B ;
Grabel, S ;
Kiefer, J ;
Kiss, JG ;
Lenarz, T ;
Mair, A ;
Maune, S ;
Müller-Deile, J ;
Piron, JP ;
Razza, S ;
Tasche, C ;
Thai-Van, H ;
Toth, F ;
Truy, E ;
Uziel, A ;
Smoorenburg, GF .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2005, 10 (02) :105-116