3D Scaffolds with Different Stiffness but the Same Microstructure for Bone Tissue Engineering

被引:148
|
作者
Chen, Guobao [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Chanjuan [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Yonggang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Biorheol Sci & Technol, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Bioengn Coll, Project Lab Biomech & Tissue Repair 111, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bone tissue engineering; 3D microenvironment; osteogenic differentiation; mesenchymal stem cells; matrix stiffness; decellularized cancellous bone; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; FLUID SHEAR-STRESS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; LINEAGE SPECIFICATION; MATRIX STIFFNESS; IN-VITRO; FATE; MECHANICS; MICROENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1021/acsami.5b02662
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
A growing body of evidence has shown that extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness can modulate stem cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, differentiation, and signaling. Stem cells can feel and respond sensitively to the mechanical microenvironment of the ECM. However, most studies have focused on classical two-dimensional (2D) or quasi-three-dimensional environments, which cannot represent the real situation in vivo. Furthermore, most of the current methods used to generate different mechanical properties invariably change the fundamental structural properties of the scaffolds (such as morphology, porosity, pore size, and pore interconnectivity). In this study, we have developed novel three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds with different degrees of stiffness but the same 3D microstructure that was maintained by using decellularized cancellous bone. Mixtures of collagen and hydroxyapatite [HA: Ca-10(PO4)(6)(OH)(2)] with different proportions were coated on decellularized cancellous bone to vary the stiffness (local stiffness, 13.00 +/- 5.55 kPa, 13.87 +/- 1.51 kPa, and 37.7 +/- 19.6 kPa; bulk stiffness, 6.74 +/- 1.16 kPa, 8.82 +/- 2.12 kPa, and 23.61 +/- 8.06 kPa). Microcomputed tomography (mu-CT) assay proved that there was no statistically significant difference in the architecture of the scaffolds before or after coating. Cell viability, osteogenic differentiation, cell recruitment, and angiogenesis were determined to characterize the scaffolds and evaluate their biological responses in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro results indicate that the scaffolds developed in this study could sustain adhesion and growth of rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and promote their osteogenic differentiation. The in vivo results further demonstrated that these scaffolds could help to recruit MSCs from subcutaneous tissue, induce them to differentiate into osteoblasts, and provide the 3D environment for angiogenesis. These findings showed that the method we developed can build scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties almost without variation in 3D microstructure. These preparations not only can provide a cell-free scaffold with optimal matrix stiffness to enhance osteogenic differentiation, cell recruitment, and angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering but also have significant implications for studies on the effects of matrix stiffness on stem cell differentiation in 3D environments.
引用
收藏
页码:15790 / 15802
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Direct Integration of 3D Printing and Cryogel Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Olevsky, Levi M.
    Anup, Amritha
    Jacques, Mason
    Keokominh, Nadia
    Holmgren, Eric P.
    Hixon, Katherine R.
    BIOENGINEERING-BASEL, 2023, 10 (08):
  • [32] Calcium phosphate blossom for bone tissue engineering 3D printing scaffolds
    Popov, Vladimir K.
    Komlev, Vladimir S.
    Chichkov, Boris N.
    MATERIALS TODAY, 2014, 17 (02) : 96 - 97
  • [33] 3D printed foamed scaffolds for tissue engineering
    Esposito, Claudio
    Mazio, Claudia
    Cesarelli, Giuseppe
    Tammaro, Daniele
    Netti, Paolo Antonio
    Maffettone, Pier Luca
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2023, 29 (13-14)
  • [34] 3D Printing of Microspheres for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds
    Lohfeld, S.
    Salash, J. R.
    McHugh, P. E.
    Detamore, M. S.
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2015, 21 : S340 - S340
  • [35] 3D printing of PLGA scaffolds for tissue engineering
    Mironov, Anton V.
    Grigoryev, Aleksey M.
    Krotova, Larisa I.
    Skaletsky, Nikolaj N.
    Popov, Vladimir K.
    Sevastianov, Viktor I.
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2017, 105 (01) : 104 - 109
  • [36] Microfabricated 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering applications
    Mata, A
    Fleischman, AJ
    Roy, S
    Nanoscale Materials Science in Biology and Medicine, 2005, 845 : 97 - 103
  • [38] 3D nanocomposite hydrogel scaffolds fabricated by rapid prototyping for bone tissue engineering
    Xu, Du-Liang
    Zhang, Jian-Guang
    Mo, Xiu-Mei
    Journal of Donghua University (English Edition), 2014, 31 (05) : 630 - 634
  • [39] Material extrusion 3D printing of bioactive smart scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Sabahi, Nasim
    Roohani, Iman
    Wang, Chun H.
    Li, Xiaopeng
    ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2025, 98
  • [40] Design, evaluation, and optimization of 3D printed truss scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Shirzad, M.
    Zolfagharian, A.
    Matbouei, A.
    Bodaghi, M.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2021, 120