3D Scaffolds with Different Stiffness but the Same Microstructure for Bone Tissue Engineering

被引:148
|
作者
Chen, Guobao [1 ,2 ]
Dong, Chanjuan [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Li [1 ,2 ]
Lv, Yonggang [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Biorheol Sci & Technol, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Bioengn Coll, Project Lab Biomech & Tissue Repair 111, Chongqing 400044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
bone tissue engineering; 3D microenvironment; osteogenic differentiation; mesenchymal stem cells; matrix stiffness; decellularized cancellous bone; MESENCHYMAL STEM-CELLS; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; FLUID SHEAR-STRESS; OSTEOGENIC DIFFERENTIATION; LINEAGE SPECIFICATION; MATRIX STIFFNESS; IN-VITRO; FATE; MECHANICS; MICROENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1021/acsami.5b02662
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
A growing body of evidence has shown that extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness can modulate stem cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, differentiation, and signaling. Stem cells can feel and respond sensitively to the mechanical microenvironment of the ECM. However, most studies have focused on classical two-dimensional (2D) or quasi-three-dimensional environments, which cannot represent the real situation in vivo. Furthermore, most of the current methods used to generate different mechanical properties invariably change the fundamental structural properties of the scaffolds (such as morphology, porosity, pore size, and pore interconnectivity). In this study, we have developed novel three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds with different degrees of stiffness but the same 3D microstructure that was maintained by using decellularized cancellous bone. Mixtures of collagen and hydroxyapatite [HA: Ca-10(PO4)(6)(OH)(2)] with different proportions were coated on decellularized cancellous bone to vary the stiffness (local stiffness, 13.00 +/- 5.55 kPa, 13.87 +/- 1.51 kPa, and 37.7 +/- 19.6 kPa; bulk stiffness, 6.74 +/- 1.16 kPa, 8.82 +/- 2.12 kPa, and 23.61 +/- 8.06 kPa). Microcomputed tomography (mu-CT) assay proved that there was no statistically significant difference in the architecture of the scaffolds before or after coating. Cell viability, osteogenic differentiation, cell recruitment, and angiogenesis were determined to characterize the scaffolds and evaluate their biological responses in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro results indicate that the scaffolds developed in this study could sustain adhesion and growth of rat mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and promote their osteogenic differentiation. The in vivo results further demonstrated that these scaffolds could help to recruit MSCs from subcutaneous tissue, induce them to differentiate into osteoblasts, and provide the 3D environment for angiogenesis. These findings showed that the method we developed can build scaffolds with tunable mechanical properties almost without variation in 3D microstructure. These preparations not only can provide a cell-free scaffold with optimal matrix stiffness to enhance osteogenic differentiation, cell recruitment, and angiogenesis in bone tissue engineering but also have significant implications for studies on the effects of matrix stiffness on stem cell differentiation in 3D environments.
引用
收藏
页码:15790 / 15802
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D printing of bone tissue engineering scaffolds
    Wang, Chong
    Huang, Wei
    Zhou, Yu
    He, Libing
    He, Zhi
    Chen, Ziling
    He, Xiao
    Tian, Shuo
    Liao, Jiaming
    Lu, Bingheng
    Wei, Yen
    Wang, Min
    BIOACTIVE MATERIALS, 2020, 5 (01) : 82 - 91
  • [2] 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Turnbull, Gareth
    Clarke, Jon
    Picard, Frederic
    Riches, Philip
    Jia, Luanluan
    Han, Fengxuan
    Li, Bin
    Shu, Wenmiao
    BIOACTIVE MATERIALS, 2018, 3 (03) : 278 - 314
  • [3] Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Gomez, S.
    Vlad, M. D.
    Lopez, J.
    Fernandez, E.
    ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2016, 42 : 341 - 350
  • [4] Antibacterial 3D bone scaffolds for tissue engineering application
    Pant, Jitendra
    Sundaram, Jaya
    Goudie, Marcus J.
    Dieu Thao Nguyen
    Handa, Hitesh
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2019, 107 (04) : 1068 - 1078
  • [5] 3D printing of ceramic scaffolds for engineering of bone tissue
    Barinov S.M.
    Vakhrushev I.V.
    Komlev V.S.
    Mironov A.V.
    Popov V.K.
    Teterina A.Y.
    Fedotov A.Y.
    Yarygin K.N.
    Inorganic Materials: Applied Research, 2015, 6 (04) : 316 - 322
  • [6] Preparation of 3D Porous Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
    Ivankovic, M.
    Bauer, L.
    Ressler, A.
    Rogina, A.
    Antunovic, M.
    Ivankovic, H.
    KEMIJA U INDUSTRIJI-JOURNAL OF CHEMISTS AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2019, 68 (9-10): : 457 - 468
  • [7] Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing
    Barbara Leukers
    Hülya Gülkan
    Stephan H. Irsen
    Stefan Milz
    Carsten Tille
    Matthias Schieker
    Hermann Seitz
    Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 2005, 16 : 1121 - 1124
  • [8] Hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering made by 3D printing
    Leukers, B
    Gülkan, H
    Irsen, SH
    Milz, S
    Tille, C
    Schieker, M
    Seitz, H
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2005, 16 (12) : 1121 - 1124
  • [9] DRUG ELUTING 3D PRINTED SCAFFOLDS FOR BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING
    Chakka, Jaidev
    Nakhla, David
    Saha, Sanjeeb
    Elangovan, Satheesh
    Salem, Aliasger
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S487 - S487
  • [10] Enzymatic crosslinked gelatin 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering
    Carmen Echave, Mari
    Pimenta-Lopes, Carolina
    Pedraz, Jose Luis
    Mehrali, Mehdi
    Dolatshahi-Pirouz, Alireza
    Ventura, Fransesc
    Orive, Gorka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2019, 562 : 151 - 161