A longer breast carcinoma screening interval for women age older than 65 years?

被引:0
作者
Boer, R [1 ]
de Koning, HJ [1 ]
van der Maas, PJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
breast neoplasms; cost-benefit analysis; mammography; mass screening; quality-adjusted life-years;
D O I
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991015)86:8<1506::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO;2-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND, The observed increase in sojourn time for preclinical breast carcinoma raises the question of whether women age greater than or equal to 65 years can be screened less frequently than younger women. METHODS. A cost-utility analysis using a computer model that simulates the demography, epidemiology, and natural history of breast carcinoma to estimate expected life-years gained, extra incidence, extra life-years with disease, and costs incurred by different breast carcinoma screening programs in the general population was conducted. RESULTS. The estimated ratio of favorable/unfavorable effects was lower for longer screening intervals compared with shorter screening intervals. The cost-effectiveness ratio was much less favorable in shorter screening intervals. CONCLUSIONS, The results of the current analysis showed that although a longer sojourn time for preclinical breast carcinoma should not necessarily be accompanied by a longer screening interval, a shorter screening interval was not very efficient. (C) 1999 American Cancer Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1506 / 1510
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] In search of the best upper age limit for breast cancer screening
    Boer, R
    deKoning, HJ
    vanOortmarssen, GJ
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1995, 31A (12) : 2040 - 2043
  • [2] BREAST-CANCER SCREENING AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS - POLICY ALTERNATIVES, QUALITY-OF-LIFE CONSIDERATIONS AND THE POSSIBLE IMPACT OF UNCERTAIN FACTORS
    DEKONING, HJ
    VANINEVELD, BM
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    DEHAES, JCJM
    COLLETTE, HJA
    HENDRIKS, JHCL
    VANDERMAAS, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1991, 49 (04) : 531 - 537
  • [3] DEKONING HJ, 1995, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V87, P1217
  • [4] NCI adopts new mammography screening guidelines for women
    Eastman, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (08) : 538 - 540
  • [5] SCREENING FOR CERVICAL-CANCER
    EDDY, DM
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (03) : 214 - 226
  • [6] THE MISCAN SIMULATION PROGRAM FOR THE EVALUATION OF SCREENING FOR DISEASE
    HABBEMA, JDF
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    LUBBE, JTN
    van der Maas, PJ
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1985, 20 (01) : 79 - 93
  • [7] PEER PGM, 1993, CANCER, V71, P3547, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930601)71:11<3547::AID-CNCR2820711114>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-C
  • [9] PREVENTIVE PAP-SMEARS - BALANCING COSTS, RISKS AND BENEFITS
    VANBALLEGOOIJEN, M
    HABBEMA, JDF
    VANOORTMARSSEN, GJ
    KOOPMANSCHAP, MA
    LUBBE, JTN
    VANAGT, HME
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 65 (06) : 930 - 933
  • [10] VANOORTMARSSEN GJ, 1990, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V66, P1601, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901001)66:7<1601::AID-CNCR2820660727>3.0.CO