Irreversible electroporation versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a propensity score analysis

被引:33
作者
He, Chaobin [1 ]
Wang, Jun [2 ]
Sun, Shuxin [1 ]
Zhang, Yu [3 ]
Lin, Xiaojun [1 ]
Lao, Xiangming [1 ]
Cui, Bokang [1 ]
Li, Shengping [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med,Canc Ctr, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Ultrason, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med,Canc Ctr, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Sun Yat Sen Univ, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; Irreversible electroporation; Chemotherapy; Radiotherapy; Efficacy; PHASE-II; GEMCITABINE; ADENOCARCINOMA; CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; CONSENSUS; SAFETY; TRIAL; CHEMORADIATION; FOLFIRINOX; ABLATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-019-5607-3
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundLocally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) represents more than one third of pancreatic cancers and owns poor survival after the standard chemotherapy. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel method and has been recently used in LAPC. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of IRE and radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy for patients with LAPC.MethodsFrom August 2015 to August 2017, a total of 76 patients with biopsy proven LAPC and who had received IRE or radiotherapy after chemotherapy were included. Thirty-two pairs of patients were selected through propensity score matching (PSM) analysis and the efficacy of two treatments was compared.ResultsBefore PSM analysis, after induction chemotherapy, patients with LAPC benefited more in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) from IRE, compared with radiotherapy (2-year OS rates, 53.5% vs 26.9%, p=0.039; 2-year PFS rates, 28.4% vs 13.3%, p=0.045). After PSM analysis, the survival benefits of OS and PFS of patients after induction chemotherapy followed by IRE were more obvious than those of patients treated with radiotherapy (2-year OS rates, 53.5% vs 20.7%, p=0.011; 2-year PFS rates, 28.4% vs 5.6%, p=0.004). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that IRE after induction chemotherapy was identified as a significant favourable factor for both OS and PFS in both the whole and matched cohort.ConclusionsInduction chemotherapy followed by IRE is superior to induction chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for treating LAPC. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of IRE and radiotherapy after the induction chemotherapy is therefore considerable.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Combined Modality Treatment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreas Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement [J].
Abrams, Ross A. ;
Lowy, Andrew M. ;
O'Reilly, Eileen M. ;
Wolff, Robert A. ;
Picozzi, Vincent J. ;
Pisters, Peter W. T. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) :1751-1756
[2]   Stage III pancreatic cancer and the role of irreversible electroporation [J].
Al Efishat, Mohammad ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Weiss, Matthew J. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
[3]   Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 10 (02) :150-161
[4]   Locally Advanced, Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline [J].
Balaban, Edward P. ;
Mangu, Pamela B. ;
Khorana, Alok A. ;
Shah, Manish A. ;
Mukherjee, Somnath ;
Crane, Christopher H. ;
Javle, Milind M. ;
Eads, Jennifer R. ;
Allen, Peter ;
Ko, Andrew H. ;
Engebretson, Anitra ;
Herman, Joseph M. ;
Strickler, John H. ;
Benson, Al B., III ;
Urba, Susan ;
Yee, Nelson S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (22) :2654-U169
[5]   Concurrent chemotherapy alone versus irreversible electroporation followed by chemotherapy on survival in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Belfiore, Giuseppe ;
Belfiore, Maria Paola ;
Reginelli, Alfonso ;
Capasso, Raffaella ;
Romano, Francesco ;
Ianniello, Giovanni Pietro ;
Cappabianca, Salvatore ;
Brunese, Luca .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 34 (03)
[6]  
Berber B, 2013, EXPERT REV ANTICANC, V13, P481, DOI [10.1586/era.13.19, 10.1586/ERA.13.19]
[7]  
Bockbrader M, 2009, EXPERT REV ANTICANC, V9, P637, DOI [10.1586/era.09.16, 10.1586/ERA.09.16]
[8]   Pretreatment Assessment of Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Expert Consensus Statement [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Chang, Kenneth J. ;
Fishman, Elliot K. ;
Talamonti, Mark S. ;
Traverso, L. William ;
Linehan, David C. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (07) :1727-1733
[9]   Irreversible Electroporation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Is there a role in conjunction with conventional treatment? [J].
Carino, Nicola de Liguori ;
O'Reilly, Derek A. ;
Siriwardena, Ajith K. ;
Valle, Juan W. ;
Radhakrishna, Ganesh ;
Pihlak, Rille ;
McNamara, Mairead G. .
EJSO, 2018, 44 (10) :1486-1493
[10]   Phase III trial comparing intensive induction chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy, infusional 5-FU and intermittent cisplatin) followed by maintenance gemcitabine with gemcitabine alone for locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer.: Definitive results of the 2000-01 FFCD/SFRO study [J].
Chauffert, B. ;
Mornex, F. ;
Bonnetain, F. ;
Rougier, P. ;
Mariette, C. ;
Bouche, O. ;
Bosset, J. F. ;
Aparicio, T. ;
Mineur, L. ;
Azzedine, A. ;
Hammel, P. ;
Butel, J. ;
Stremsdoerfer, N. ;
Maingon, P. ;
Bedenne, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (09) :1592-1599