Ontogenic sources of variation in sexual size dimorphism in a viviparous lizard

被引:47
作者
Le Galliard, JF
Massot, M
Landys, MM
Meylan, S
Clobert, J
机构
[1] Univ Paris 06, LabFonctionnement & Evolut Syst Ecol, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Univ Oslo, Ctr Ecol & Evolutionary Synth, Dept Biol, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oslo, Dept Biol, Program Expt Behav & Ecol Res, EBE, Oslo, Norway
关键词
body size; Lacerta vivipara; maternal effects; plasticity; sexual dimorphism; viviparity;
D O I
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01094.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
To elucidate the developmental aspects of the evolution of sexual size dimorphism (SSD), an understanding of the sex-specific ontogeny of body size is critical. Here, we evaluate the relative importance of genetic and environmental determinants of SSD in juvenile common lizards (Lacerta vivipara). We examined the prenatal and post-natal effects of population density and habitat humidity on SSD, as well as the maternal effects of food availability, corticosterone level, humidity and heat regime during gestation. Analyses indicated strong prenatal and post-natal plasticity in body size per se and yielded three main results with respect to SSD. First, SSD in juvenile common lizards matches qualitatively the SSD observed in adults. Secondly, SSD was influenced by none of the prenatal factors investigated here, suggesting poor sex-biased maternal effects on offspring size. Thirdly, SSD was sensitive to post-natal habitat humidity, which positively affected growth rate more strongly in females than in males. Thus, natural variation in SSD in juvenile common lizards appears to be primarily determined by a combination of sex-biased genetic factors and post-natal conditions. We discuss the possibility that viviparity may constrain the evolution of sex-biased maternal effects on offspring size.
引用
收藏
页码:690 / 704
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
ANDERSOSON M, 1994, SEXUAL SELECTION
[2]   CLUTCH SIZE AND REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT IN LIZARD LACERTA-VIVIPARA JACQUIN [J].
AVERY, RA .
OECOLOGIA, 1975, 19 (02) :165-170
[3]  
Badyaev AV, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P384
[4]  
Badyaev AV, 2000, EVOLUTION, V54, P987
[5]   Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism [J].
Badyaev, AV .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2002, 17 (08) :369-378
[6]   The evolution of body size: What keeps organisms small? [J].
Blanckenhorn, WU .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2000, 75 (04) :385-407
[7]   Sex-specific selective pressures on body mass in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula [J].
Bouteiller-Reuter, C ;
Perrin, N .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2005, 18 (02) :290-300
[8]   Global warming and positive fitness response in mountain populations of common lizards Lacerta vivipara [J].
Chamaillé-Jammes, S ;
Massot, M ;
Aragón, P ;
Clobert, J .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2006, 12 (02) :392-402
[9]   PRENATAL INFLUENCES ON REPRODUCTIVE LIFE-HISTORY STRATEGIES [J].
CLARK, MM ;
GALEF, BG .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1995, 10 (04) :151-153
[10]  
CLOBERT J, 1994, LIZARD ECOLOGY, P183