Multi-trait Genomic Selection Methods for Crop Improvement

被引:45
作者
Moeinizade, Saba [1 ]
Kusmec, Aaron [2 ]
Hu, Guiping [1 ]
Wang, Lizhi [1 ]
Schnable, Patrick S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Ind & Mfg Syst Engn, 3014 Black Engn Bldg, Ames, IA 50010 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50010 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
multi-trait genomic selection; simulation; optimization; Genomic Prediction; INDEX SELECTION; STRATEGY; OPTIMIZATION; RESISTANCE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1534/genetics.120.303305
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Plant breeders make selection decisions based on multiple traits, such as yield, plant height, flowering time, and disease resistance. A commonly used approach in multi-trait genomic selection is index selection, which assigns weights to different traits relative to their economic importance. However, classical index selection only optimizes genetic gain in the next generation, requires some experimentation to find weights that lead to desired outcomes, and has difficulty optimizing nonlinear breeding objectives. Multi-objective optimization has also been used to identify the Pareto frontier of selection decisions, which represents different trade-offs across multiple traits. We propose a new approach, which maximizes certain traits while keeping others within desirable ranges. Optimal selection decisions are made using a new version of the look-ahead selection (LAS) algorithm, which was recently proposed for single-trait genomic selection, and achieved superior performance with respect to other state-of-the-art selection methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the new method, a case study is developed using a realistic data set where our method is compared with conventional index selection. Results suggest that the multi-trait LAS is more effective at balancing multiple traits compared with index selection.
引用
收藏
页码:931 / 945
页数:15
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement [J].
Akdemir, Deniz ;
Beavis, William ;
Fritsche-Neto, Roberto ;
Singh, Asheesh K. ;
Isidro-Sanchez, Julio .
HEREDITY, 2019, 122 (05) :672-683
[2]   Efficient Breeding by Genomic Mating [J].
Akdemir, Deniz ;
Sanchez, Julio I. .
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2016, 7
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, P 6 WORLD C GEN APPL
[4]   Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 [J].
Bates, Douglas ;
Maechler, Martin ;
Bolker, Benjamin M. ;
Walker, Steven C. .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01) :1-48
[5]  
Brascamp E. W., 1984, Animal Breeding Abstracts, V52, P645
[6]   A Unified Approach to Genotype Imputation and Haplotype-Phase Inference for Large Data Sets of Trios and Unrelated Individuals [J].
Browning, Brian L. ;
Browning, Sharon R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2009, 84 (02) :210-223
[7]   SELECTION FOR GRAIN-YIELD FOLLOWING SELECTION FOR EAR HEIGHT IN MAIZE [J].
BURGESS, JC ;
WEST, DR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (04) :679-682
[8]   Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets [J].
Chang, Christopher C. ;
Chow, Carson C. ;
Tellier, Laurent C. A. M. ;
Vattikuti, Shashaank ;
Purcell, Shaun M. ;
Lee, James J. .
GIGASCIENCE, 2015, 4
[9]   Modeling crop breeding for global food security during climate change [J].
Cowling, Wallace A. ;
Li, Li ;
Siddique, Kadambot H. M. ;
Banks, Robert G. ;
Kinghorn, Brian P. .
FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY, 2019, 8 (02)
[10]   Selection on Optimal Haploid Value Increases Genetic Gain and Preserves More Genetic Diversity Relative to Genomic Selection [J].
Daetwyler, Hans D. ;
Hayden, Matthew J. ;
Spangenberg, German C. ;
Hayes, Ben J. .
GENETICS, 2015, 200 (04) :1341-+