EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL MACHINE LEARNING METHODS FOR BRAIN TUMOUR TYPE CLASSIFICATION

被引:4
作者
Hedyehzadeh, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Nezhad, Shadi Yoosefian Dezfuli [1 ]
Safdarian, Naser [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Dezful Branch, Dezful, Iran
[2] Dezful Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dezful, Iran
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Tabriz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Tabriz, Iran
来源
COMPTES RENDUS DE L ACADEMIE BULGARE DES SCIENCES | 2020年 / 73卷 / 06期
关键词
glioma; Fuzzy C-Means; Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix; Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm; Support Vector Machine; IMAGES; SEGMENTATION; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.7546/CRABS.2020.06.14
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to provide an automated method in order to diagnose benign and malignant brain tumours using MR images. Four hundred and sixty-one glioma patients' MR images including low and high grades were downloaded from TCIA portal. After pre-processing, Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) segmentation method was used for tumour region extraction and texture features were extracted from gray level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Finally, three classifiers' performances were compared using sensitivity, accuracy and specificity measurements. Random Forest (RF) and K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN) were used without any parameter optimization and Support Vector Machine (SVM) and the parameters were optimized using Grasshopper optimization algorithm (GOA). The applied classifiers performance for different values of its parameters were calculated and the best result was reported as optimum value. For segmentation purpose, using FCM, based on visual inspection, the clusters' optimum number 3 has been measured. In case of RF, SVM with polynomial kernel and KNN, all three measurements were larger than 96% and therefore no optimization was applied. For SVM with Linear and RBF kernel, parameters were optimized using GOA and results demonstrated 39% increase in specificity of linear kernel after optimization. The performance of SVM, RF and KNN methods in classification of brain tumours has been investigated. Reports indicated the specificity and sensitivity for all reviewed methods are larger than 95% and approximate performance equality within results of all methods has been viewed. This high equally performance indicates the robustness of proposed method in glioma type classification.
引用
收藏
页码:856 / 865
页数:10
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Comparison of a Strategy Favoring Early Surgical Resection vs a Strategy Favoring Watchful Waiting in Low-Grade Gliomas
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Myrmel, Kristin S.
    Kloster, Roar
    Torp, Sverre H.
    Lindal, Sigurd
    Unsgard, Geirmund
    Solheim, Ole
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (18): : 1881 - 1888
  • [2] Fuzzy c-Means (FCM) for Optic Cup and Disc Segmentation with Morphological Operation
    Khalid, Noor Elaiza Abdul
    Noor, Noorhayati Mohamed
    Ariff, Norharyati Md.
    [J]. MEDICAL AND REHABILITATION ROBOTICS AND INSTRUMENTATION (MRRI2013), 2014, 42 : 255 - 262
  • [3] Delineation and diagnosis of brain tumors from post contrast T1-weighted MR images using rough granular computing and random forest
    Koley, Subhranil
    Sadhu, Anup K.
    Mitra, Pabitra
    Chakraborty, Basabi
    Chakraborty, Chandan
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2016, 41 : 453 - 465
  • [4] The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system (vol 114, pg 97, 2007)
    Louis, David N.
    Ohgaki, Hiroko
    Wiestler, Otmar D.
    Cavenee, Webster K.
    Burger, Peter C.
    Jouvet, Anne
    Scheithauer, Bernd W.
    Kleihues, Paul
    [J]. ACTA NEUROPATHOLOGICA, 2007, 114 (05) : 547 - 547
  • [5] Mohsen H, 2017, ANN DUNAREA JOS U
  • [6] Brain tumors detection and segmentation in MR images: Gabor wavelet vs. statistical features
    Nabizadeh, Nooshin
    Kubat, Miroslav
    [J]. COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 45 : 286 - 301
  • [7] CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010
    Ostrom, Quinn T.
    Gittleman, Haley
    Farah, Paul
    Ondracek, Annie
    Chen, Yanwen
    Wolinsky, Yingli
    Stroup, Nancy E.
    Kruchko, Carol
    Barnholtz-Sloan, Jill S.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 : 1 - 56
  • [8] Pedano N., 2016, Cancer Imaging Arch.
  • [9] Grasshopper Optimisation Algorithm: Theory and application
    Saremi, Shahrzad
    Mirjalili, Seyedali
    Lewis, Andrew
    [J]. ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2017, 105 : 30 - 47
  • [10] Scarpace L., 2016, CANC IMAGING ARCH, V11