Recursive recognition in the international political economy

被引:15
作者
Broome, Andre [1 ]
Seabrooke, Leonard [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Polit & Int Studies, Coventry, W Midlands, England
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Org, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] Norwegian Inst Int Affairs, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Authority; governance; legitimacy; benchmarks; rationalization; structural power; consultancies; intergovernmental organizations; global professional service firms; SOCIETY; WORLD; POWER; GLOBALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; GOVERNANCE; EXPERTISE; AUTHORITY; EXPANSION; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1080/09692290.2020.1830827
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
How are the tools that govern the world economy legitimated? Here we discuss how governance tools - such as policy scripts, templates, and benchmarks - are developed to contain particular types of knowledge. Such tools contain blueprints of how the world economy should work. Understanding how they are produced and legitimated is important if we are to comprehend how they replicate particular bodies of knowledge, policy languages, and norms. We suggest that 'recursive recognition' is an important trend in the international political economy, where different types of organizations legitimate particular governance tools; especially ones producing common metrics. For example: a private foundation releases a study on best practices in policy areaX, which is then referred to as best practice by an intergovernmental organization, an NGO, a firm, and a global professional service firm. Investigating the extent of this phenomenon requires addressing two blind spots. The first blind spot is conceptual in the reification of agency and authority based on organizational types. The second blind spot is empirical in identifying how pervasive recursive recognition has become, and how it affirms the reproduction of power asymmetries.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 381
页数:13
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]   International regulation without international government: Improving IO performance through orchestration [J].
Abbott, Kenneth W. ;
Snidal, Duncan .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2010, 5 (03) :315-344
[2]   Differentiating and connecting indicators: the quality and performance of law in the World Bank's Doing Business Project [J].
Arslan, Melike .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW IN CONTEXT, 2020, 16 (01) :17-38
[3]  
Avant D.D., 2010, WHO GOVERNS GLOBE
[4]   A political economy of positions in climate change negotiations: Economic, structural, domestic, and strategic explanations [J].
Bailer, Stefanie ;
Weiler, Florian .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, 2015, 10 (01) :43-66
[5]   Asymmetric diffusion: World Bank 'best practice' and the spread of arbitration in national investment laws [J].
Berge, Tarald Laudal ;
St John, Taylor .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2021, 28 (03) :584-610
[6]  
Best Jacqueline., 2014, Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance
[7]  
Blyth M., 2002, GREAT TRANSFORMATION
[8]   Professional service firms as agents of economic globalization: A political perspective [J].
Boussebaa, Mehdi ;
Faulconbridge, James R. .
JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONS AND ORGANIZATION, 2019, 6 (01) :72-90
[9]   Constructing Global Firms? National, Transnational and Neocolonial Effects in International Management Consultancies [J].
Boussebaa, Mehdi ;
Morgan, Glenn ;
Sturdy, Andrew .
ORGANIZATION STUDIES, 2012, 33 (04) :465-486
[10]   Seeing like the IMF: Institutional change in small open economies [J].
Broome, Andre ;
Seabrooke, Leonard .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2007, 14 (04) :576-601