Preparation and anesthetic properties of propofol microemulsions in rats

被引:41
作者
Morey, Timothy E.
Modell, Jerome H.
Shekhawat, Dushyant
Grand, Todd
Shah, Dinesh O.
Gravenstein, Nikolaus
McGorray, Susan P.
Dennis, Donn M.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Anesthesiol, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Chem Engn, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[3] NanoMedex Inc, Alachua, FL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200606000-00013
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The lipophilicity of propofol has required dispersion in a soybean macroemulsion. The authors hypothesized that the anesthetic properties of propofol are preserved when reformulated as a transparent microemulsion rather than as a turbid macroemulsion and that the dose-response relation can be selectively modified by altering the microemulsion's surfactant type and concentration. Methods: Microemulsions of propofol were formulated using purified poloxamer 188 (3%, 5%, 7%), and sodium salt of fatty acids (C-8 C-10, C-12) in saline and characterized using ternary/ binary diagrams, particle sizing, and stability upon dilution. Rats received propofol (10 mg center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1)) as either a microemulsion or a conventional macroemulsion to determine these end points: induction (dose; stunned; loss of lash reflex, righting reflex, withdrawal to toe pinch) and recovery (recovery of lash, righting, withdrawal reflexes). After a 14-day recovery period, rats were crossed over into the opposite experimental limb. Results: Forty-eight microemulsions (diameter, 11.9-47.7 nm) were formulated. Longer carbon chain length led to a marked increase in the volume of diluent necessary to break these microemulsions. All rats experienced anesthetic induction with successful recovery, although significantly greater doses of propofol were required to induce anesthesia with microemulsions irrespective of surfactant concentration or type than with macroemulsions. The sodium salt of C-10 fatty acid microemulsion required the greatest dose and longest time for anesthetic induction. Conclusion: Propofol microemulsions cause induction in rats similar to that from macroemulsions. The surfactant concentration and type markedly affect the spontaneous destabilization and anesthetic properties of microemulsions, a phenomenon suggesting a mechanism whereby dose-response relation can be selectively modified.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1190
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   The optimal effective concentration of lidocaine to reduce pain on injection of propofol [J].
Ho, CM ;
Tsou, MY ;
Sun, MS ;
Chu, CC ;
Lee, TY .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1999, 11 (04) :296-300
[22]   Possible anaphylaxis after propofol in a child with food allergy [J].
Hofer, KN ;
McCarthy, MW ;
Buck, ML ;
Hendrick, AE .
ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 37 (03) :398-401
[23]  
Holmberg K., 1998, Q CENTURY PROGR NEW, P161
[24]   Endothelin receptor blockade in canine oleic acid-induced lung injury [J].
Hubloue, I ;
Biarent, D ;
Kafi, SA ;
Bejjani, G ;
Mélot, C ;
Naeije, R ;
Leeman, M .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 29 (06) :1003-1006
[25]   COMPLEMENT-MEDIATED REACTIONS TO DIAZEPAM WITH CREMOPHOR AS SOLVENT (STESOLID MR) [J].
HUTTEL, MS ;
OLESEN, AS ;
STOFFERSEN, E .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1980, 52 (01) :77-79
[26]   Phospholipid-based microemulsion formulation of all-trans-retinoic acid for parenteral administration [J].
Hwang, SR ;
Lim, SJ ;
Park, JS ;
Kim, CK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2004, 276 (1-2) :175-183
[27]   Popliteal sciatic penneural local anesthetic infusion - A comparison of three dosing regimens for postoperative analgesia [J].
Ilfeld, BM ;
Thannikary, LJ ;
Morey, TE ;
Griend, RAV ;
Enneking, FK .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (04) :970-977
[28]   PROPOFOL-BASED ANESTHESIA AS COMPARED WITH STANDARD ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES FOR MIDDLE-EAR SURGERY [J].
JELLISH, WS ;
LEONETTI, JP ;
MURDOCH, JR ;
FOWLES, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1995, 7 (04) :292-296
[29]   Low pH, caprylate incubation as a second viral inactivation step in the manufacture of albumin - Parametric and validation studies [J].
Johnston, A ;
Uren, E ;
Johnstone, D ;
Wu, J .
BIOLOGICALS, 2003, 31 (03) :213-221
[30]   Pharmacokinetics, induction of anaesthesia and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN vs propofol 1% SAZN and Diprivan®-10 after bolus injection [J].
Knibbe, CAJ ;
Voortman, HJ ;
Aarts, LPHJ ;
Kuks, PFM ;
Lange, R ;
Langemeijer, HJM ;
Danhof, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 47 (06) :653-660