Relationships between starch pattern indices and starch concentrations in four apple cultivars

被引:41
作者
Doerflinger, Franziska C. [1 ]
Miller, William B. [1 ]
Nock, Jacqueline F. [1 ]
Watkins, Christopher B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Hort Sect, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Malus domestica; Starch; Starch pattern index; Ethylene; Maturity; Amylose; INTERNAL QUALITY ATTRIBUTES; I-AD INDEX; 1-METHYLCYCLOPROPENE; 1-MCP; DELICIOUS APPLES; STORAGE ORGANS; FRUIT DROP; MATURATION; MATURITY; AMYLOSE; AMYLOPECTIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.07.012
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
One of the most widely used measurements to assess apple [Malus sylvestris (L) Mill var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] maturity is the starch pattern index (SPI), but relatively little is known about changes in its relationship with starch concentration in the fruit during maturation and ripening. Relationships between SPI and starch concentrations in 'Gala', 'Honeycrisp', 'McIntosh', and 'Empire' fruit harvested over several weeks have been investigated. While SPI values increased and starch concentration decreased over the sampling period, the relationship between the two factors was curvilinear for all cultivars. The binding capacity of iodine to starch is determined by the starch composition and consequently by the amylose (AM) concentration. Therefore, changes in AM concentration in total starch were assessed to evaluate whether changes in AM account for discrepancies between SPI values and changes in starch concentration. Low levels of AM at later stages of fruit development account in part for the discrepancy between SPI and starch concentration, due to the low staining potential of the remaining starch (amylopectin (AP)). Evaluation of SPI values was also carried out by calculation of percentage stained area by means of image analysis; changes in SPI and % staining were linear for all cultivars but to different degrees depending on cultivar. Computational analysis of SPI images has the potential to be more consistent, but interpretation of the index number assigned still relies heavily on a general understanding of fruit maturation. Understanding cultivar specific differences in the starch iodine staining patterns and the influential factors on starch during ripening can lead to an overall better understanding of SPI as a harvest index. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 95
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   STARCH TRANSFORMATION DURING BANANA RIPENING .1. THE PHOSPHORYLASE AND PHOSPHATASE BEHAVIOR IN MUSA-ACUMINATA [J].
AREAS, JAG ;
LAJOLO, FM .
JOURNAL OF FOOD BIOCHEMISTRY, 1981, 5 (01) :19-37
[2]  
Blanpied G.D., 1992, Cornell Cooperative Extension Bulletin, P221, DOI [10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2017.09.001, DOI 10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2017.09.001]
[3]   Starch degradation and starch pattern indices; Interpretation and relationship to maturity [J].
Brookfield, P ;
Murphy, P ;
Harker, R ;
MacRae, E .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 11 (01) :23-30
[4]   RAPID DETERMINATION OF STARCH IN APPLES [J].
CARTER, GH ;
NEUBERT, AM .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1954, 2 (21) :1070-1072
[5]   CO2 assimilation, carbohydrate metabolism, xanthophyll cycle, and the antioxidant system of 'Honeycrisp' apple leaves with zonal chlorosis [J].
Chen, LS ;
Cheng, LL .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2004, 129 (05) :729-737
[6]   A quantified index for rapid evaluation of starch content in apples [J].
Cho, YJ ;
Gil, B .
ADVANCES IN NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, PT 1-3, 2004, 270-273 :1032-1037
[7]  
Chu C.L., 1988, STARCH IODINE TEST D, P88
[8]  
Donald AM, 2001, ROY SOC CH, P45
[9]   Preharvest applications of sprayable 1-methylcyclopropene in the orchard for management of apple harvest and postharvest condition [J].
Elfving, Don C. ;
Drake, Stephen R. ;
Reed, A. Nathan ;
Visser, Dwayne B. .
HORTSCIENCE, 2007, 42 (05) :1192-1199
[10]   A quantitative histochemical procedure for measurement of starch in apple fruits [J].
Ernst, MK ;
Matitschka, G ;
Chatterton, NJ ;
Harrison, PA .
HISTOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 31 (11) :705-710