Physical aggression facilitates social information processing

被引:1
|
作者
Markovits, Henry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3P8, Canada
关键词
Social cognition; Aggression; Social information processing; Social rules; MECHANISMS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2013.07.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Physical aggression appears to have a much stronger effect on behavior than its overt frequency of occurrence would suggest. Studies examining effects of observing aggressive behavior and others looking at cognitive differences related to aggressive behavior suggest that physical aggression might be processed preferentially by the cognitive system. In order to examine this hypothesis, adult participants were given a social cue learning task. Study 1 presented three conditions which were identical except for the description of one potential outcome. Participants learned the cue more often when this outcome involved physical aggression (hit) compared to non-physical aggression (steal) or being friendly. Study 2 showed that the specific nature of the cue had no effect on success rates. Study 3 compared unusual outcomes involving aggression (being hit with a suitcase) and non-aggression (dancing). Results show that people were more accurate with the former. These results provide evidence that physical aggression is processed more efficiently than other forms of social interaction and gives a cognitive basis for the specific impact of physical aggression on behavior. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1026
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Social Information Processing Model as a Framework for Explaining Frequent Aggression in Adults with Mild to Moderate Intellectual Disabilities: A Systematic Review of the Evidence
    Larkin, Peter
    Jahoda, Andrew
    MacMahon, Ken
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 26 (05) : 447 - 465
  • [32] Social Information-Processing Skills and Aggression: A Quasi-Experimental Trial of the Making Choices and Making Choices Plus Programs
    Terzian, Mary A.
    Li, Jilan
    Fraser, Mark W.
    Day, Steven H.
    Rose, Roderick A.
    RESEARCH ON SOCIAL WORK PRACTICE, 2015, 25 (03) : 358 - 369
  • [33] New Developments in Developmental Research on Social Information Processing and Antisocial Behavior
    Fontaine, Reid Griffith
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 38 (05) : 569 - 573
  • [34] New Developments in Developmental Research on Social Information Processing and Antisocial Behavior
    Reid Griffith Fontaine
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2010, 38 : 569 - 573
  • [35] Executive function and the development of social information processing during the preschool years
    Caporaso, Jessica S.
    Marcovitch, Stuart
    Boseovski, Janet J.
    COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 58
  • [36] Interactive Virtual Reality versus Vignette-Based Assessment of Children's Aggressive Social Information Processing
    Verhoef, Rogier E. J.
    Verhulp, Esmee E.
    van Dijk, Anouk
    de Castro, Bram O.
    RESEARCH ON CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2022, 50 (05): : 621 - 636
  • [37] Cognitive pathways to the forms and functions of aggression in adolescence: the role of early maladaptive schemas and social information processing
    Vagos, Paula
    Fabris, Matteo Angelo
    Rijo, Daniel
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2025, 16
  • [38] Perceived maternal control and support: Effects on hostile biased social information processing and aggression among clinic-referred children with high aggression
    Gomez, R
    Gomez, A
    DeMello, L
    Tallent, R
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 42 (04) : 513 - 522
  • [39] Interpreting Sexual Dating Encounters: Social Information Processing Differences in Men and Women
    Ambrose, Carrie E.
    Gross, Alan M.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY VIOLENCE, 2016, 31 (03) : 361 - 370
  • [40] Social information processing in preschool children: Relations to sociodemographic risk and problem behavior
    Ziv, Yair
    Sorongon, Alberto
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 109 (04) : 412 - 429