First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy

被引:41
作者
Heemskerk, J [1 ]
van Dam, R [1 ]
van Gemert, WG [1 ]
Beets, GL [1 ]
Greve, JWM [1 ]
Jacobs, MJHM [1 ]
Bouvy, ND [1 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
robotic surgery; laparoscopy; cholecystectomy;
D O I
10.1159/000091445
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers less post-operative pain, less complications, and faster recovery compared with open cholecystectomy. However, laparoscopic surgery can be demanding because of several technical drawbacks. Robotic surgery allows dexterity skills to be performed faster and shortens the learning curve, possibly leading to faster and safer laparoscopic surgery. Methods: In this paper, we report the results of our first 12 cases of fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Surgical System, comparing them with 12 cases of conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Using a fourth arm in robotic laparoscopy enables the surgeon to perform surgery without the use of a tableside assistant, leading to non-tiring, tremble-free assistance and reducing salary costs. Primary end points are operating time and costs. Secondary end points are operative complications and duration of admission. Results: Fully robotic cholecystectomy was completed in all 12 cases without increased complication rate and without conversions. However, robotic assistance results in an increased overall operating room stay of 31 min and increased costs of EUR 1,180.62. Conclusion: Fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectonny is safe and feasible but seems more expensive and time consuming at this moment. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 431
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY [J].
BASS, EB ;
PITT, HA ;
LILLEMOE, KD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 165 (04) :466-471
[2]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - HOSPITALIZATION, SICK LEAVE, ANALGESIA AND TRAUMA RESPONSES [J].
BERGGREN, U ;
GORDH, T ;
GRAMA, D ;
HAGLUND, U ;
RASTAD, J ;
ARVIDSSON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) :1362-1365
[3]   Wait-and-see policy or laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile-duct stones: a randomised trial [J].
Boerma, D ;
Rauws, EAJ ;
Keulemans, YCA ;
Janssen, IMC ;
Bolwerk, CJM ;
Timmer, R ;
Boerma, EJ ;
Obertop, H ;
Huibregtse, K ;
Gouma, DJ .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9335) :761-765
[4]   Economics of surgery [J].
Brazier, JE ;
Johnson, AG .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9287) :1077-1081
[5]   Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A good buy? A cost comparison with small-incision (mini) cholecystectomy [J].
Calvert, NW ;
Troy, GP ;
Johnson, AG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2000, 166 (10) :782-786
[6]   Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery [J].
Delaney, CP ;
Lynch, AC ;
Senagore, AJ ;
Fazio, VW .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (12) :1633-1639
[7]   Robotics in general surgery - Personal experience in a large community hospital [J].
Giulianotti, PC ;
Coratti, A ;
Angelini, M ;
Sbrana, F ;
Cecconi, S ;
Balestracci, T ;
Caravaglios, G .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2003, 138 (07) :777-784
[8]   Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system [J].
Hernandez, JD ;
Bann, SD ;
Munz, Y ;
Moorthy, K ;
Datta, V ;
Martin, S ;
Dosis, A ;
Bello, F ;
Darzi, A ;
Rockall, T .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (03) :372-378
[9]   Randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for acute and gangrenous cholecystitis [J].
Kiviluoto, T ;
Sirén, J ;
Luukkonen, P ;
Kivilaakso, E .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9099) :321-325
[10]  
Koperna T, 1999, HEPATO-GASTROENTEROL, V46, P753