Market power monitoring and mitigation in the US wholesale power markets

被引:54
作者
Helman, U [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Energy Regulatory Commiss, Washington, DC 20426 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.011
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Under current statutory requirements, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) must ensure that prices in US wholesale power markets are 'just and reasonable'. This has been interpreted by the agency and the courts as requiring the monitoring and mitigation of undue market power. This paper focuses on generation market power. Prior to electricity sector restructuring, wholesale bilateral power trading took place among vertically integrated monopoly utilities trading at the margin or between small independent producers and the utilities. Under those conditions, the authorization of trading at market prices, called 'market-based rates', required only that the generation supplier pass a simple market share screen for market power. As restructuring unfolded, and market conditions changed, there has been a steady evolution in FERC's market power mitigation rules, encompassing (a) changes in the market power assessment required for granting market-based rates and related methods for merger approval, and (b) development and refinement of new techniques for screening and mitigating offers into the organized day-ahead and real-time markets operated by Independent System Operators (ISOs) and Regional Transmission Organizations (RTOs). This paper reviews these changes to date, as FERC continues to clarify its approved rules and procedures. It also examines recent methods for quantitative market power analysis that could augment current procedures or supplant them, as found appropriate. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:877 / 904
页数:28
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, MODELING PRICES COMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, FED REGISTER, V61, p[21, 540]
[3]   Electricity market equilibrium models: The effect of parametrization [J].
Baldick, R .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2002, 17 (04) :1170-1176
[4]  
Berry C. A., 1999, Utilities Policy, V8, P139, DOI 10.1016/S0957-1787(99)00016-8
[5]   The competitive effects of transmission capacity in a deregulated electricity industry [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, J ;
Stoft, S .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2000, 31 (02) :294-325
[6]  
Borenstein S, 1999, ENERGY J, V20, P65
[7]   The trouble with electricity markets: Understanding California's restructuring disaster [J].
Borenstein, S .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (01) :191-211
[8]   Measuring market inefficiencies in California's restructured wholesale electricity market [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, JB ;
Wolak, FA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 92 (05) :1376-1405
[9]   A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States [J].
Bushnell, J .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 51 (01) :80-93
[10]  
BUSHNELL J, CSEMWP129 U CAL