An examination of the reliability of a classification algorithm for subgrouping patients with low back pain

被引:96
作者
Fritz, JM
Brennan, GP
Clifford, SN
Hunter, SJ
Thackeray, A
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Div Phys Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Intermt Hlth Care, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Med Ctr, Ctr Rehab Serv, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
low back pain; classification; subgroups; examination; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000193898.14803.8a
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Test-retest design to examine interrater reliability. Objective. Examine the interrater reliability of individual examination items and a classification decision-making algorithm using physical therapists with varying levels of experience. Summary of Background Data. Classifying patients based on clusters of examination findings has shown promise for improving outcomes. Examining the reliability of examination items and the classification decisionmaking algorithm may improve the reproducibility of classification methods. Methods. Patients with low back pain less than 90 days in duration participating in a randomized trial were examined on separate days by different examiners. Interrater reliability of individual examination items important for classification was examined in clinically stable patients using kappa coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients. The findings from the first examination were used to classify each patient using the decision-making algorithm by clinicians with varying amounts of experience. The reliability of the classification algorithm was examined with kappa coefficients. Results. A total of 123 patients participated (mean age 37.7 [+/- 10.7] years, 44% female), 60 (49%) remained stable between examinations. Reliability of range of motion, centralization/peripheralization judgments with flexion and extension, and the instability test were moderate to excellent. Reliability of centralization/ peripheralization judgments with repeated or sustained extension or aberrant movement judgments were fair to poor. Overall agreement on classification decisions was 76% (kappa = 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.64), with no significant differences based on level of experience. Conclusion. Reliability of the classification algorithm was good. Further research is needed to identify sources of disagreements and improve reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 82
页数:6
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   THE PROGNOSTIC CONSEQUENCES IN THE MAKING OF THE INITIAL MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS OF WORK-RELATED BACK INJURIES [J].
ABENHAIM, L ;
ROSSIGNOL, M ;
GOBEILLE, D ;
BONVALOT, Y ;
FINES, P ;
SCOTT, S .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (07) :791-795
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PHYS THER
[3]   Manual therapy and exercise therapy in patients with chronic low back pain - A randomized, controlled trial with 1-year follow-up [J].
Aure, OF ;
Nilsen, JH ;
Vasseljen, O .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (06) :525-531
[4]   Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments [J].
Beurskens, AJHM ;
deVet, HCW ;
Koke, AJA .
PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) :71-76
[5]   A report from the Second International Forum for Primary Care Research on Low Back Pain - Reexamining priorities [J].
Borkan, JM ;
Koes, B ;
Reis, S ;
Cherkin, DC .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :1992-1996
[6]   Methodologic issues in low back pain research in primary care [J].
Bouter, LM ;
van Tulder, MW ;
Koes, BW .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2014-2020
[7]  
Bowling RW, 1997, CUMULATIVE TRAUMA DI, P499
[8]  
BRENNAN GP, IN PRESS SPINE
[9]   Classification systems of soft tissue disorders of the neck and upper limb: Do they satisfy methodological guidelines? [J].
Buchbinder, R ;
Goel, V ;
Bombardier, C ;
HoggJohnson, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1996, 49 (02) :141-149
[10]   Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain [J].
Childs, JD ;
Piva, SR ;
Fritz, JM .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (11) :1331-1334