Prioritising the types of manufacturing flexibility in an uncertain environment

被引:45
作者
Chang, An-Yuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Formosa Univ, Dept Ind Management, Huwei 632, Yunlin, Taiwan
[2] Natl Formosa Univ, Inst Ind Engn & Management, Huwei 632, Yunlin, Taiwan
关键词
environmental uncertainty; manufacturing flexibility; quality function deployment; analytic hierarchy process; grey relational analysis; MACHINE; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1080/00207543.2011.565156
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Researchers have stressed that manufacturing system flexibility research requires a quantitative model allowing a manufacturing system to prioritize its flexibility dimension and promote the performance of the manufacturing system. A quantification model presented in the present research is demonstrated to assess the degree of environmental uncertainty and illustrates a method for delivering the requirement of flexibility improvement for the manufacturing system so that the company is able to prioritize the types of manufacturing flexibility which a manufacturing system requires in an uncertain environment. Quantitative approaches including quality function deployment (QFD), analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and grey relational analysis (GRA) have been employed to find a means for improving the flexibility of a manufacturing system to cope with environmental uncertainty. QFD is the focal approach for the deployment of the integrated structure of the research. AHP is applied to explore the relative weighted importance of environmental uncertainty factors, while GRA is used to find out the relationships between manufacturing flexibility and environmental uncertainty. A combination of these approaches reveals a useful tool for managers to prioritize the types of flexibility which a manufacturing system requires for coping with an uncertain environment. In particular, the present research studied the manufacturing flexibility requirements of a food company in Taiwan.
引用
收藏
页码:2133 / 2149
页数:17
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Aggarwal S., 1995, Industrial Management, V37, P20
[2]  
[Anonymous], MANUFACTURING FLEXIB
[3]  
[Anonymous], PRODUCTION INVENTORY
[4]   Flexibility in logistic systems - modeling and performance evaluation [J].
Barad, M ;
Sapir, DE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2003, 85 (02) :155-170
[5]   FLEXIBILITY IN MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS - DEFINITIONS AND PETRI NET MODELING [J].
BARAD, M ;
SIPPER, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1988, 26 (02) :237-248
[6]   CIM flexibility measures: A review and a framework for analysis and applicability assessment [J].
Barad, M ;
Nof, SY .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 1997, 10 (1-4) :296-308
[7]   IMPACT OF SOME FLEXIBILITY FACTORS IN FMSS - A PERFORMANCE EVALUATION APPROACH [J].
BARAD, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1992, 30 (11) :2587-2602
[8]   A review of manufacturing flexibility [J].
Beach, R ;
Muhlemann, AP ;
Price, DHR ;
Paterson, A ;
Sharp, JA .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2000, 122 (01) :41-57
[9]  
Browne J., 1984, FMS Magazine, V2, P114
[10]  
Carter M.F., 1986, Proc. 2nd ORSA/TIMS Conference on Flexible Manufacturing Systems, P107