SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIPS OF DIFFERENT PLANT FUNCTIONAL GROUPS IN TROPICAL MONSOON RAINFORESTS (HAINAN ISLAND, CHINA)

被引:0
作者
Liu, Wan-De [1 ]
Zang, Run-Guo [2 ]
Ding, Yi [2 ]
Zhang, Wie-Yin [2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Forestry, Res Inst Resources Insect, Kunming 650224, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Forestry, Inst Forest Ecol Environm & Protect, Beijing 100091, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
plant functional groups; species richness; sampling area; species-area relationships; tropical monsoon rainforest; GROUP DIVERSITY; PATTERNS; ACCUMULATION; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEMS; SUCCESSION; MECHANISM; HABITAT; TRAITS; CURVES;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The positive relationship between the number of species in an area and the size of the habitat studied (species-area relationship, SAR) is the foundation of ecological theory and the most studied issues in ecology. However, very few studies have addressed SARs and their relationships to functional group richness and the extent of habitat area studied. We analyzed SARs in different functional groups focusing on two types of tropical monsoon rainforests on Hainan Island, China. The number of trees, shrubs, lianas, all species, deciduous species, evergreen species, thorn species, non-thorn species, simple-leaved species, and compound-leaved species were strongly related to the size of the area studied in the two tropical monsoon rainforest communities. And the size of the area studied explained over 94% of the total variations in the number of families and other groups studied. No significant differences were found for the slope of the species-area curve (Z) of different functional groups in two tropical monsoon rainforest communities except for shrubs that were taller in the Terminalia hainanensis community (TC) than in Liquid-ambar formosana community (LC). In the comparison of different functional groups divided by the same principle in the same tropical monsoon rainforest, no significant difference was found for the value of Z for different functional groups except that Z for lianas were higher than for shrubs in LC. However, the Z of lianas was higher than that of trees and shrubs, and evergreen species and species without thorns had higher Z values than deciduous species and species with thorns. No significant differences were found between simple-leaved species and compound-leaved species in TC. The results indicated the SARs of different plant functional groups can be well-described by the power function, although their slopes differed significantly.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 11
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Guilds or functional groups: does it matter? [J].
Blondel, J .
OIKOS, 2003, 100 (02) :223-231
[2]   Community response to removals of plant functional groups and species from a Chihuahuan desert shrubland [J].
Buonopane, M ;
Huenneke, LF ;
Remmenga, M .
OIKOS, 2005, 110 (01) :67-80
[3]   Effect of community assembly and primary succession on the species-area relationship in disturbed ecosystems [J].
Carey, Susan ;
Harte, John ;
del Moral, Roger .
ECOGRAPHY, 2006, 29 (06) :866-872
[4]   Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species [J].
Condit, R ;
Ashton, PS ;
Baker, P ;
Bunyavejchewin, S ;
Gunatilleke, S ;
Gunatilleke, N ;
Hubbell, SP ;
Foster, RB ;
Itoh, A ;
LaFrankie, JV ;
Lee, HS ;
Losos, E ;
Manokaran, N ;
Sukumar, R ;
Yamakura, T .
SCIENCE, 2000, 288 (5470) :1414-1418
[5]   Species-area and species-individual relationships for tropical trees: A comparison of three 50-ha plots [J].
Condit, R ;
Hubbell, SP ;
Lafrankie, JV ;
Sukumar, R ;
Manokaran, N ;
Foster, RB ;
Ashton, PS .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1996, 84 (04) :549-562
[6]   A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide [J].
Cornelissen, JHC ;
Lavorel, S ;
Garnier, E ;
Díaz, S ;
Buchmann, N ;
Gurvich, DE ;
Reich, PB ;
ter Steege, H ;
Morgan, HD ;
van der Heijden, MGA ;
Pausas, JG ;
Poorter, H .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2003, 51 (04) :335-380
[7]   Which function describes the species-area relationship best? A review and empirical evaluation [J].
Dengler, Juergen .
JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2009, 36 (04) :728-744
[8]   The imprint of the geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area relationships [J].
Drakare, S ;
Lennon, JJ ;
Hillebrand, H .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (02) :215-227
[9]  
Dyer AR, 2001, FUNCT ECOL, V15, P85, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2001.00487.x
[10]   To fit or not to fit? A poorly fitting procedure produces inconsistent results when the species-area relationship is used to locate hotspots [J].
Fattorini, Simone .
BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2007, 16 (09) :2531-2538