The effect of reference point prices on mergers and acquisitions

被引:229
作者
Baker, Malcolm [2 ,3 ]
Pan, Xin
Wurgler, Jeffrey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NYU Stern Sch Business, New York, NY USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Business, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
Mergers; Acquisitions; Offer price; Reference point; Behavioral corporate finance; PROSPECT-THEORY; STOCK-MARKET; DISPOSITION; MANAGEMENT; PREFERENCE; VALUATION; BEHAVIOR; DRIVES; POISON; LONG;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.010
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Prior stock price peaks of targets affect several aspects of merger and acquisition activity. Offer prices are biased toward recent peak prices although they are economically unremarkable. An offer's probability of acceptance jumps discontinuously when it exceeds a peak price. Conversely, bidder shareholders react more negatively as the offer price is influenced upward toward a peak. Merger waves occur when high returns on the market and likely targets make it easier for bidders to offer a peak price. Parties thus appear to use recent peaks as reference points or anchors to simplify the complex tasks of valuation and negotiation. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 71
页数:23
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   RISK REDUCTION AS A MANAGERIAL MOTIVE FOR CONGLOMERATE MERGERS [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
LEV, B .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1981, 12 (02) :605-617
[2]   New evidence and perspectives on mergers [J].
Andrade, G ;
Mitchell, M ;
Stafford, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2001, 15 (02) :103-120
[3]  
Babcock L, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1337
[4]   Choosing the wrong pond: Social comparisons in negotiations that reflect a self-serving bias [J].
Babcock, L ;
Wang, XH ;
Loewenstein, G .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1996, 111 (01) :1-19
[5]  
Baker M., 2009, NEW MANAGEMENT UNPUB
[6]  
Baker Malcolm., 2007, HDB CORPORATE FINANC, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53265-7.50018-4
[7]   Prospect theory and asset prices [J].
Barberis, N ;
Huang, M ;
Santos, T .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2001, 116 (01) :1-53
[8]   What Drives the Disposition Effect? An Analysis of a Long-Standing Preference-Based Explanation [J].
Barberis, Nicholas ;
Xiong, Wei .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (02) :751-784
[9]  
Ben-David I., 2010, MANAGERIAL MIS UNPUB
[10]   Toeholds, bid jumps, and expected payoffs in takeovers [J].
Betton, S ;
Eckbo, BE .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2000, 13 (04) :841-882