Maternal outcome monitoring: induction of labor versus spontaneous onset of labor-a retrospective data analysis

被引:13
|
作者
Kiesewetter, Barbara [1 ]
Lehner, Rainer [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Div Feto Maternal Med & Obstet, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Wahringer Gurtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Induction of labor; Prolonged pregnancy; Secondary cesarean; Post-term pregnancy; EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT; CESAREAN DELIVERY; ELECTIVE INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; TERM; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-012-2239-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
To determine the efficacy and maternal complication rates of induction of labor, and to identify a concrete point in time for induction with the lowest possible risk for adverse events. We designed a retrospective data analysis of all births at the general hospital of Vienna from 2003 to 2008 (n = 16,872) and compared maternal complications of induced labors from 38 or more weeks of gestation versus spontaneous deliveries. The ethical committee of the General Hospital of Vienna and the Medical University of Vienna monitored this study and provided approval. Women who had induction between 38 and 42 weeks of gestation (n = 1,254) had a significant higher risk for the need of a secondary cesarean (15.2 vs. 8.6%; p < 0.001) and a higher chance for abnormally adherent placentas (1.5 vs. 2.5%; p = 0.13). The amount of maternal blood loss was equal in both groups. Concerning the question when to induct labor, there was no significant difference of distribution of complications between induced labors at term and induction within the next 10 days. This study suggests that induction is associated with a higher risk for secondary cesareans and abnormally adherent placentas. The exact time of induction seems to be irrelevant between expected date of delivery and the next 10 days.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New onset of meconium during labor versus primary meconium-stained amniotic fluid - is there a difference in pregnancy outcome?
    Hiersch, Liran
    Melamed, Nir
    Rosen, Hadar
    Peled, Yoav
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Yogev, Yariv
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2014, 27 (13) : 1361 - 1367
  • [42] Maternal and neonatal outcomes following induction of labor for fetal growth restriction: Extra-amniotic balloon versus prostaglandins
    Hochberg, Alyssa
    Amikam, Uri
    Krispin, Eyal
    Wiznitzer, Arnon
    Hadar, Eran
    Salman, Lina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 160 (02) : 678 - 684
  • [43] Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Verhoeven, C. J. M.
    Opmeer, B. C.
    Oei, S. G.
    Latour, V.
    van der Post, J. A. M.
    Mol, B. W. J.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 42 (05) : 500 - 508
  • [44] Effect of induction of labor on maternal and perinatal outcomes in low-risk singleton pregnancies: a retrospective case-control study
    Zhang, Q. -J.
    Chen, S. -W.
    Xu, X.
    Zhang, H. -L.
    Yan, J. -Y.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (16) : 5918 - 5925
  • [45] Maternal health-related quality of life after induction of labor or expectant monitoring in pregnancy complicated by intrauterine growth retardation beyond 36 weeks
    Bijlenga, Denise
    Boers, Kim E.
    Birnie, Erwin
    Mol, Ben-Willem J.
    Vijgen, Sylvia C. M.
    Van der Post, Joris A. M.
    De Groot, Christianne J.
    Rijnders, Robbert J. P.
    Pernet, Paula J.
    Roumen, Frans J.
    Stigter, Rob H.
    Delemarre, Friso M. C.
    Bremer, Henk A.
    Porath, Martina
    Scherjon, Sicco A.
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (09) : 1427 - 1436
  • [46] COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SAFETY, EFFICACY AND FETOMATERNAL OUTCOME OF INDUCTION OF LABOR WITH TABLET MIFEPRISTONE AND TABLET MISOPROSTOL VERSUS TABLET MISOPROSTOL
    Archana, Ashtekar
    Shilpa, Chaudhari
    Amrapali, Gosavi
    Tanvi, Warty
    Manika, Singh
    Shreya, Karan
    Swati, Sharma
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2014, 3 (49): : 11706 - 11714
  • [47] Health-Related Quality of Life after Induction of Labor versus Expectant Monitoring in Gestational Hypertension or Preeclampsia at Term
    Bijlenga, Denise
    Koopmans, Corine M.
    Birnie, Erwin
    Mol, Ben-Willem J.
    van der Post, Joris A.
    Bloemenkamp, Kitty W.
    Scheepers, Hubertina C.
    Willekes, Christine
    Kwee, Anneke
    Heres, Marion H.
    Van Beek, Erik
    Van Meir, Claudia A.
    Van Huizen, Marloes E.
    Van Pampus, Maria G.
    Bonsel, Gouke J.
    HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2011, 30 (03) : 260 - 274
  • [48] Regional practice variation in induction of labor in the Netherlands: Does it matter? A multilevel analysis of the association between induction rates and perinatal and maternal outcomes
    Offerhaus, Pien D.
    van Haaren-Ten Haken, Tamar M.
    Keulen, Judit K. J.
    de Jong, Judith D.
    Brabers, Anne E. M.
    Verhoeven, Corine J. M.
    Scheepers, Hubertina C. J.
    Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (06):
  • [49] Gene Expression Analysis of the Microdissected Trophoblast Layer of Human Placenta after the Spontaneous Onset of Labor
    Kim, Soo Hyun
    Shim, Sung Han
    Sung, Se Ra
    Lee, Kyung A.
    Shim, Jung Yun
    Cha, Dong Hyun
    Lee, Kyoung Jin
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10):
  • [50] Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with induction of labor after one previous cesarean delivery: A French retrospective study
    Vecchioli, Emma
    Cordier, Anne-Gael
    Chantry, Anne
    Benachi, Alexandra
    Monier, Isabelle
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (08):