The origins of lithic projectile point technology: evidence from Africa, the Levant, and Europe

被引:315
作者
Shea, JJ [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Anthropol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
stone tools projectile points; Middle Paleolithic/Middle Stone Age; Upper Paleolithic/Later Stone Age;
D O I
10.1016/j.jas.2005.10.015
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
Projectile weaponry is a human cultural universal, but its origins and antiquity remain poorly understood. Stone- and bone-tipped projectile weapons have long been treated as emergent features of the "Upper Paleolithic" behavioral revolution. Recently it has been proposed that projectile technology was in widespread use among Homo sapiens populations in Africa during Middle Stone Age (MSA) times. One obstacle to researching the origins of projectile point technology is that the criteria archaeologists employ for recognizing plausible and implausible stone projectile points are largely subjective (overall tool shape, microwear traces). Tip cross-sectional area (TCSA) is a ballistically significant dimension that works well at discriminating North American stone projectile points (spearthrower dart tips and arrowheads) from spear points. This paper compares the TCSA values of ethnographic North American stone projectile points to hypothetical Middle and Upper Paleolithic stone projectile points from Africa, the Levant, and Europe. The results of this comparison do not support the hypothesis of widespread use of stone-tipped projectiles in Africa, the Levant, or Europe prior to 40 Ka. In the New World and in Australia, where we have the richest ethnographic record of stone projectile point use, these implements are largely employed in big-game hunting and in warfare. One or both of these factors may have played a role in the widespread adoption of stone projectile point technology after 40 Ka. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 846
页数:24
相关论文
共 167 条
[41]  
CLARK JD, 1955, C PAN PREH ACT 2 SES, P403
[42]  
Clark JD., 1984, AFR ARCHAEOL REV, V2, P37, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01117225, 10.1007/BF01117225]
[43]   Radiocarbon dating the appearance of modern humans and timing of cultural innovations in Europe: new results and new challenges [J].
Conard, NJ ;
Bolus, M .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION, 2003, 44 (03) :331-371
[44]  
COPELAND, 2000, PALEORIENT, V26, P73
[45]   ARROWPOINT OR DART POINT - AN UN-INTERESTING ANSWER TO A TIRESOME QUESTION [J].
CORLISS, DW .
AMERICAN ANTIQUITY, 1980, 45 (02) :351-352
[46]  
Crew H. L., 1976, PREHISTORY PALEOENVI, V1, P75
[47]  
Davies W., 2003, NEANDERTHALS MODERN, P31
[48]  
Debenath A., 1994, Handbook of Paleolithic Typology: Lower and Middle Paleolithic of Europe, V1
[49]  
DESONNEVILLEBOR.D, 1955, B SOC PREHISTORIQUE, V52, P327
[50]  
Dillehay T.D, 2000, SETTLEMENT AM NEW PR