Recycling versus Long-Term Storage of Nuclear Fuel: Economic Factors

被引:7
作者
Yolanda Moratilla Soria, B. [1 ]
Uris Mas, Maria [1 ]
Estadieu, Mathilde [1 ]
Villar Lejarreta, Ainhoa [1 ]
Echevarria-Lopez, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ P Comillas, ETSI ICAI, Catedra Rafael Marino Nuevas Tecnol Energet, Madrid 28015, Spain
关键词
SPENT; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1155/2013/417048
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
The objective of the present study is to compare the associated costs of long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel-open cycle strategy-with the associated cost of reprocessing and recycling strategy of spent fuel-closed cycle strategy-based on the current international studies. The analysis presents cost trends for both strategies. Also, to point out the fact that the total cost of spent nuclear fuel management (open cycle) is impossible to establish at present, while the related costs of the closed cycle are stable and known, averting uncertainties.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, LOW CARBON NUCL FUTU
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, COST HIGH LEV WAST D
[3]  
Bunn M., EC REPROCESSING VERS
[4]  
Chiguer M., RECYCLING OPTION USE
[5]   A methodology for calculating the levelized cost of electricity in nuclear power systems with fuel recycling [J].
De Roo, Guillaume ;
Parsons, John E. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (05) :826-839
[6]  
Du Y., 2009, 09004 CTR EN ENV POL
[7]  
EPRI, 2007, 1015387 EPRI
[8]   Spent nuclear fuel policies in historical perspective: An international comparison [J].
Hogselius, Per .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (01) :254-263
[9]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2005, COUNTR NUCL FUEL PRO
[10]   The economic future of nuclear power [J].
Joskow, Paul L. ;
Parsons, John E. .
DAEDALUS, 2009, 138 (04) :45-59