Sensitivity of penman-monteith reference crop evapotranspiration in Tao'er River Basin of northeastern China

被引:45
作者
Liang Liqiao [1 ,2 ]
Li Lijuan [1 ]
Zhang Li [1 ,2 ]
Li Jiuyi [1 ,2 ]
Li Bin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Grad Univ, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
reference crop evapotranspiration; Penman-Monteith Equation; sensitivity coefficient; Tao'er River Basin;
D O I
10.1007/s11769-008-0340-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A non-dimensional relative sensitivity coefficient was employed to predict the responses of reference crop evapotranspiration (ET0) to perturbation of four climate variables in Tao'er River Basin of the northeastern China. Mean monthly ET0 and yearly ET0 from 1961 to 2005 were estimated with the FAO-56 Penman-Monteith Equation. A 45-year historical dataset of average monthly maximum/minimum air temperature, mean air temperature, wind speed, sunshine hours and relative humidity from 15 meteorological stations was used in the analysis. Results show that: 1) Sensitivity coefficients of wind speed, air temperature and sunshine hours were positive except for those of air temperature of Arxan Meteorological Station, while those of relative humidity were all negative. Relative humidity was the most sensitive variable in general for the Tao'er River Basin, followed by sunshine hours, wind speed and air temperature. 2) Similar to climate variable, monthly sensitivity coefficients exhibit large annual fluctuations. 3) Sensitivity coefficients for four climate variables all showed significant trends in seasonal/yearly series. Also, sensitivity coefficients of air temperature, sunshine hours and wind speed all showed significant trends in spring. 4) Among all sensitivity coefficients, the average yearly sensitivity coefficient of relative humidity was highest throughout the basin and showed largest spatial variability. Longitudinal distribution of sensitivity coefficients for air temperature, relative humidity and sunshine hours was also found, which was similar to the distribution of the three climate variables.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 347
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model [J].
Anderton, S ;
Latron, M ;
Gallart, F .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 16 (02) :333-353
[3]  
[Anonymous], CLIM ENV
[4]   Plackett-Burman techniques for sensitivity analysis of many-parametered models [J].
Beres, DL ;
Hawkins, DM .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2001, 141 (1-3) :171-183
[5]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF THE PENMAN-MONTEITH ACTUAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATES [J].
BEVEN, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1979, 44 (3-4) :169-190
[6]  
CAI JB, 2007, AGR FOREST METEOROL, V45, P22, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.AGRFOR-MET.2007.04.012
[7]   Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions [J].
Droogers, Peter ;
Allen, Richard G. .
2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers (16)
[8]   An analysis of sensitivity of terrestrial ecosystems in China to climatic change using spatial simulation [J].
Gao, Q ;
Yu, M ;
Yang, XS .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2000, 47 (04) :373-400
[9]   Sensitivity of the Penman-Monteith reference evapotranspiration to key climatic variables in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) basin [J].
Gong, Lebing ;
Xu, Chong-yu ;
Chen, Deliang ;
Halldin, Sven ;
Chen, Yongqin David .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 329 (3-4) :620-629
[10]   Sensitivity of evapotranspiration to global warming: a case study of arid zone of Rajasthan (India) [J].
Goyal, RK .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2004, 69 (01) :1-11