Automation of the SHIELD Methodology for System Hazard Analysis and Resilient Design

被引:0
|
作者
Marcus, Anthony [1 ]
Cardei, Ionut [1 ]
Alsenas, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Comp & Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Southeast Natl Marine Renewable Engy Ctr, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
来源
2013 7TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON 2013) | 2013年
关键词
risk analysis; hazard analysis; system resilience engineering; Bayesian Trees;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The System Hazard Indication and Extraction Learning Diagnosis (SHIELD) methodology was developed as a novel method to perform system hazard analysis and resilient design. In an earlier paper we described SHIELD conceptually and outlined the details necessary to conduct the analysis manually. This approach integrates state space examination into the analysis process in order to facilitate efficient and comprehensive identification of undiscovered risks and hazard scenarios. SHIELD requires that three phases be performed serially to achieve a system hazard evaluation: decomposition, evaluation and prescription. The first phase of SHIELD, decomposition, breaks the system down hierarchically and recursively into smaller components so that the state space associated with each component is more manageable for the user. In the evaluation phase experts analyze the associated state space and transitions for each component, recursively, bottom-up. The prescription phase applies a set of heuristics to the results from the preceding phase to reduce system hazard. The main contribution of this paper is the automation of the methodology to reduce the effort used for analysis without sacrificing accuracy or overlooking hazardous state combinations. We describe in detail our automation concept and preliminary tests with the prototype.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 901
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Risk-Based Analysis of Design Practices in Regard to Passenger Hazard Exposure in Open Mass Transit Stations
    Sebastian Gintschel
    Phumin Kirawanich
    Urban Rail Transit, 2020, 6 : 15 - 27
  • [42] Application of hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system to the cheese-making industry: A review
    Sandrou, DK
    Arvanitoyannis, IS
    FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 16 (03) : 327 - 368
  • [43] Model-based risk analysis for system design
    Mendes, J. Pedro
    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2024, 27 (01) : 5 - 20
  • [44] A Risk-Based Analysis of Design Practices in Regard to Passenger Hazard Exposure in Open Mass Transit Stations
    Gintschel, Sebastian
    Kirawanich, Phumin
    URBAN RAIL TRANSIT, 2020, 6 (01) : 15 - 27
  • [45] Implementation of System-Based Hazard Analysis on Physical Safety Barrier: A Case Study in Subsea HIPPS
    Rachman, Andika
    Ratnayake, R. M. Chandima
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 11 - 15
  • [46] Collision hazard modeling and analysis in a multi-mobile robots system transportation task with STPA and SPN
    Bensaci, Chaima
    Zennir, Youcef
    Pomorski, Denis
    Innal, Fares
    Lundteigen, Mary Ann
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 234
  • [47] System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) for Hazard Analysis in Complex Systems: The Case of "Demand-Side Management in a Smart Grid"
    Karatzas, Stylianos
    Chassiakos, Athanasios
    SYSTEMS, 2020, 8 (03): : 1 - 19
  • [48] A conceptual framework integrating numerical simulation with system theory based method for quantitative explosion process hazard analysis
    Zhou, Shennan
    Wang, Zhongqi
    Li, Qizhong
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2022, 166 : 202 - 211
  • [49] Economical risk analysis on design safety for seepage prevention system
    Chen, Yong-gui
    Zou, Yin-sheng
    Zhang, Ke-neng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, 2007, 2 : 166 - 169
  • [50] Risk analysis for the design of a safe artificial pancreas control system
    Konstanze Kölle
    Anders Lyngvi Fougner
    Mary Ann Lundteigen
    Sven Magnus Carlsen
    Reinold Ellingsen
    Øyvind Stavdahl
    Health and Technology, 2019, 9 : 311 - 328