Automation of the SHIELD Methodology for System Hazard Analysis and Resilient Design

被引:0
|
作者
Marcus, Anthony [1 ]
Cardei, Ionut [1 ]
Alsenas, Gabriel [2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Atlantic Univ, Dept Comp & Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
[2] Florida Atlantic Univ, Southeast Natl Marine Renewable Engy Ctr, Boca Raton, FL 33431 USA
来源
2013 7TH ANNUAL IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (SYSCON 2013) | 2013年
关键词
risk analysis; hazard analysis; system resilience engineering; Bayesian Trees;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The System Hazard Indication and Extraction Learning Diagnosis (SHIELD) methodology was developed as a novel method to perform system hazard analysis and resilient design. In an earlier paper we described SHIELD conceptually and outlined the details necessary to conduct the analysis manually. This approach integrates state space examination into the analysis process in order to facilitate efficient and comprehensive identification of undiscovered risks and hazard scenarios. SHIELD requires that three phases be performed serially to achieve a system hazard evaluation: decomposition, evaluation and prescription. The first phase of SHIELD, decomposition, breaks the system down hierarchically and recursively into smaller components so that the state space associated with each component is more manageable for the user. In the evaluation phase experts analyze the associated state space and transitions for each component, recursively, bottom-up. The prescription phase applies a set of heuristics to the results from the preceding phase to reduce system hazard. The main contribution of this paper is the automation of the methodology to reduce the effort used for analysis without sacrificing accuracy or overlooking hazardous state combinations. We describe in detail our automation concept and preliminary tests with the prototype.
引用
收藏
页码:894 / 901
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Validation of system safety hazard analysis in safety-critical industries: An interview study with industry practitioners
    Sadeghi, Reyhaneh
    Goerlandt, Floris
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2023, 161
  • [22] A simulation-based methodology for aiding advanced driver assistance systems hazard analysis and risk assessment
    Sini, Jacopo
    Violante, Massimo
    MICROELECTRONICS RELIABILITY, 2020, 109
  • [23] Hazard Analysis and Validation Metrics Framework for System of Systems Software Safety
    Michael, James Bret
    Shing, Man-Tak
    Cruickshank, Kristian John
    Redmond, Patrick James
    IEEE SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2010, 4 (02): : 186 - 197
  • [24] Risk analysis system of geo-hazard based on GIS technique
    ZHU Liangfeng
    2. China Research Institute of Land Resources and Economy
    JournalofGeographicalSciences, 2002, (03) : 123 - 128
  • [25] Hazard Analysis for Self-Adaptive Systems Using System-Theoretic Process Analysis
    Diemert, Simon
    Weber, Jens H.
    2023 IEEE/ACM 18TH SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR ADAPTIVE AND SELF-MANAGING SYSTEMS, SEAMS, 2023, : 145 - 156
  • [26] Risk Analysis of Airplane Upsets in Flight: An Integrated System Framework and Analysis Methodology
    Lu, Na
    Meng, Bin
    AEROSPACE, 2023, 10 (05)
  • [27] Using a system theory based method (STAMP) for hazard analysis in process industry
    Yousefi, Abouzar
    Rodriguez Hernandez, Manuel
    JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2019, 61 : 305 - 324
  • [28] Hazard analysis system of urban post-earthquake fire based on GIS
    李杰
    江建华
    李明浩
    Acta Seismologica Sinica(English Edition), 2001, (04) : 448 - 455
  • [29] Software hazard analysis for nuclear digital protection system by Colored Petri Net
    Bai, Tao
    Chen, Wei-Hua
    Liu, Zhen
    Gao, Feng
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 110 : 486 - 491
  • [30] Model-based Hazard Analysis Method on Automotive Programmable Electronic System
    Zhang, Hongkun
    Li, Wenjun
    Chen, Wei
    2010 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (BMEI 2010), VOLS 1-7, 2010, : 2658 - 2661